Thread: Size restriction on patches list
Marc, can we increase the size of messages allowed on the patches list? I am getting complaints about delays, and I keep the patches 1-2 days before being applied too. People are starting to try and bypass the limit by posting URL's or sending emails directly to me; neither seems good. Also, can we allow people subscribed to one list to post to other lists even though they are not subscribed. Seems like it would improve list response times. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc, can we increase the size of messages allowed on the patches list? > I am getting complaints about delays, and I keep the patches 1-2 days > before being applied too. Damn, I searched for this before, couldn't find it, and just found it now: %mj_shell -p xx configset pgsql-patches maxlength = 400000 maxlength set to "400000". 400k large enough?
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc, can we increase the size of messages allowed on the patches list? > > I am getting complaints about delays, and I keep the patches 1-2 days > > before being applied too. > > Damn, I searched for this before, couldn't find it, and just found it now: > > %mj_shell -p xx configset pgsql-patches maxlength = 400000 > maxlength set to "400000". > > 400k large enough? Oh, very good. Do we get large emails that need blocking? Should it be 1MB, which I believe is the default for most mailers? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026