Thread: Re: Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

Re: Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

From
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
>     #if SIZEOF_UINT8 == 0
>
> Right now it is testing for __BEOS__, which I believe is something set
> by the compiler and not by configure.
>
> My idea is to just unconditionally define the unsigned's in odbc.  It
> will fail on a few platforms but I don't see another solution.

Well, since AIX does not have the unsigned's, I think leaving odbc's
md5.h as it was with the #ifndef __BEOS__ in place is OK.

Andreas

Re: Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
>
> >     #if SIZEOF_UINT8 == 0
> >
> > Right now it is testing for __BEOS__, which I believe is something set
> > by the compiler and not by configure.
> >
> > My idea is to just unconditionally define the unsigned's in odbc.  It
> > will fail on a few platforms but I don't see another solution.
>
> Well, since AIX does not have the unsigned's, I think leaving odbc's
> md5.h as it was with the #ifndef __BEOS__ in place is OK.

Really? Seems some AIX must have the unsigneds or we wouldn't be
needing a new patch, right?  Am I missing something?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026