Thread: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
From
"Dave Cramer"
Date:
I am contemplating including log4jme source code into the jdbc driver. Who would be the best person to contact wrt ironing out the licensing issues? Dave
> > I am contemplating including log4jme source code into the jdbc driver. > Who would be the best person to contact wrt ironing out the licensing > issues? Can you tell us what license it uses? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
From
"Dave Cramer"
Date:
It is using the apache licence http://www.qos.ch/log4jME/LICENSE.txt It appears that they allow the code to be used in either binary or source as long as their licence remains intact Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] Sent: November 1, 2001 2:49 PM To: dave@fastcrypt.com Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver > > I am contemplating including log4jme source code into the jdbc driver. > Who would be the best person to contact wrt ironing out the licensing > issues? Can you tell us what license it uses? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania190
Dave Cramer writes: > It is using the apache licence > > http://www.qos.ch/log4jME/LICENSE.txt > > It appears that they allow the code to be used in either binary or > source as long as their licence remains intact The apache license has an advertising clause, which is not acceptable. Getting someone to relicense the software is difficult to impossible if there is a multitude of outside contributors. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
From
"Dave Cramer"
Date:
Peter, I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with this clause? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: November 4, 2001 8:05 AM To: Dave Cramer Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver Dave Cramer writes: > It is using the apache licence > > http://www.qos.ch/log4jME/LICENSE.txt > > It appears that they allow the code to be used in either binary or > source as long as their licence remains intact The apache license has an advertising clause, which is not acceptable. Getting someone to relicense the software is difficult to impossible if there is a multitude of outside contributors. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
Dave Cramer writes: > I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with > this clause? It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver to mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and impractical. More generally, it would introduce a divergence in licensing in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter