Thread: Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit

Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the selectlimit

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
> > I don't think that enough votes are needed to reverse 
> > the change. You broke the discussion first rule.

Are you subscribed to general?  We had a big discussion there and there
was almost universal agreement that the LIMIT #,# syntax is too
error-prone, and the only reason to have it was for MySQL compatibility. 
Of course, our syntax is backward, so is it not a compatibility but an
incompatibility.

Everyone thought LIMIT # OFFSET # was preferred.

I don't mind reversing out all of this but I can't make everyone happy.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


Re: [GENERAL] To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the

From
Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > > I don't think that enough votes are needed to reverse
> > > the change. You broke the discussion first rule.
> 
> Are you subscribed to general?  We had a big discussion there and there

I know the discussion and I've thought Peter's objection was
suffienctly valid to reverse your change but the discussion
has continued.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue