Tatsuo Ishii writes:> I saw over 7 hours delay between postgresql.org and sever1.pgsql.org.> Does anynone know what's
happeninghere?
I've seen massive delays too:
Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)id EAA08864; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:41 +0100
(BST)
Received: from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)id f9G3Oh219345; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 04:24:44
+0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
idf9G3Ljq66512for <lkindness@csl.co.uk>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:23:36 -0500 (CDT)(envelope-from
pgsql-hackers-owner+M14283=csl.co.uk=lkindness@postgresql.org)
Received: from mail1.hub.org (webmail.hub.org [216.126.85.1])by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9FNaKP72316for<pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:36:20 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])by mail1.hub.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9FGg8X57598for<pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:42:08 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9FGg6g02963for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org;
Mon,15 Oct 2001 12:42:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110151642.f9FGg6g02963@candle.pha.pa.us>
and this one's days:
Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)id KAA11316; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100
(BST)
Received: from postgresql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)id f9G9Y3220747; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:34:03 +0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with SMTP id
f9G0GHP83130;Mon,15 Oct 2001 20:16:27 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from pgsql-announce-owner+M120@postgresql.org)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.navpoint.com [162.33.245.46])by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9D4our63609;Sat,13 Oct 2001 00:50:56 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id f9D4oqo09577;Sat, 13 Oct 2001 00:50:52 -0400
(EDT)
Message-Id: <200110130450.f9D4oqo09577@candle.pha.pa.us>
Hardly any (yours omong the excepted, headers below) messages are
coming through in a timely fashion:
Received: from mail.csl.co.uk by euphrates.csl.co.uk (8.9.3/ConceptI 2.4)id PAA14131; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:46 +0100
(BST)
Received: from server1.pgsql.org by mail.csl.co.uk (8.11.1/ConceptO 2.3)id f9GEHl222496; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:17:47
+0100
Received: from postgresql.org (webmail.postgresql.org [216.126.85.28])by server1.pgsql.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
idf9GEEEs48462for <lkindness@csl.co.uk>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:16:31 -0500 (CDT)(envelope-from
pgsql-hackers-owner+M14305=csl.co.uk=lkindness@postgresql.org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id
f9GCDVP15349for<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:13:32 -0400 (EDT)(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.13.152])by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id
VAA16107for<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:28 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii@portsv3-24.sra.co.jp [133.137.84.24])by sranhm.sra.co.jp
(8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-srambox)with ESMTP id VAA10335for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:13:26 +0900
Message-Id: <20011016211312V.t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Lee.
