Thread: Server crash caused by CHECK on child
-- Hi Kevin, and everyone! -- -- I don't think that I only found a minor bug compared to -- the other you wrote in your last letter: the backend crash -- is caused by the same CHECK constraint in the child table. -- -- However, for you without time to analyzing Kevin's huge -- scheme, here is the very simplified, crash-causing script. -- ------------------------------------ drop table child; drop table ancestor; create table ancestor ( node_id int4, a int4 ); create table child ( b int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 , c int4 not null default 3, CHECK ( child.b = 0 OR child.b = 1 ) ) inherits (ancestor); insert into ancestor values (3,4); insert into child (node_id, a, b) values (5,6,1); update ancestor set a=8 where node_id=5; --------------------------------- -- -- I am hunting it, but I have to learn all what this query-executing -- about, so probably it takes uncomparable longer for me than for -- a developer. -- -- Regards, -- Baldvin --
What version are you trying this script on? I'm not seeing a crash on my 7.2 devel system (and the update occurs). On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Kovacs Baldvin wrote: > -- Hi Kevin, and everyone! > -- > -- I don't think that I only found a minor bug compared to > -- the other you wrote in your last letter: the backend crash > -- is caused by the same CHECK constraint in the child table. > -- > -- However, for you without time to analyzing Kevin's huge > -- scheme, here is the very simplified, crash-causing script. > -- > ------------------------------------ > > drop table child; > drop table ancestor; > > create table ancestor ( > node_id int4, > a int4 > ); > > create table child ( > b int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 , > c int4 not null default 3, > CHECK ( child.b = 0 OR child.b = 1 ) > ) inherits (ancestor); > > insert into ancestor values (3,4); > insert into child (node_id, a, b) values (5,6,1); > > update ancestor set a=8 where node_id=5;
I can confirm this now works fine in current sources. No crash. > -- Hi Kevin, and everyone! > -- > -- I don't think that I only found a minor bug compared to > -- the other you wrote in your last letter: the backend crash > -- is caused by the same CHECK constraint in the child table. > -- > -- However, for you without time to analyzing Kevin's huge > -- scheme, here is the very simplified, crash-causing script. > -- > ------------------------------------ > > drop table child; > drop table ancestor; > > create table ancestor ( > node_id int4, > a int4 > ); > > create table child ( > b int4 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 , > c int4 not null default 3, > CHECK ( child.b = 0 OR child.b = 1 ) > ) inherits (ancestor); > > insert into ancestor values (3,4); > insert into child (node_id, a, b) values (5,6,1); > > update ancestor set a=8 where node_id=5; > > --------------------------------- > -- > -- I am hunting it, but I have to learn all what this query-executing > -- about, so probably it takes uncomparable longer for me than for > -- a developer. > -- > -- Regards, > -- Baldvin > -- > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026