Thread: RC1 core dumps in initdb on Solaris 2.6
The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core file indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed as a result of the "More bogus alignment assumptions" thread will sort things out. Here are initdb.log and the stack trace. If needs be I can recompile with -g but unless I hear otherwise I'll wait for RC2. -- Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent pete.forman@westerngeco.com -./\.- opinion of Schlumberger, Baker http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- Hughes or their divisions.
Attachment
Pete Forman <pete.forman@westerngeco.com> writes: > The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core file > indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed as a > result of the "More bogus alignment assumptions" thread will sort > things out. Sure looks like this is the same issue reported (and fixed) before. Would you try it with current CVS or last night's snapshot tarball? regards, tom lane
Tom Lane writes:> Pete Forman <pete.forman@westerngeco.com> writes:> > The regression test is failing early on, during initdb. The core> > file indicates that there is a SIGBUS. Hopefully the bugs fixed> > as a result of the "More bogus alignmentassumptions" thread will> > sort things out.> > Sure looks like this is the same issue reported (and fixed) before.>Would you try it with current CVS or last night's snapshot tarball? Yes, it is fixed in the snapshot of 2001-03-27, as is the earlier bug in pg_backup_null.c. All tests passed. I've registered the result via the web form though the report is not accurate. Can somebody update the Remarks or Version field to indicate that I was using a snapshot rather than RC1 OOTB. -- Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated WesternGeco -./\.- by myself and does not represent pete.forman@westerngeco.com -./\.- opinion of Schlumberger, Baker http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- Hughes or their divisions.
Pete Forman writes:> I've registered the result via the web form though the report is> not accurate. Can somebody updatethe Remarks or Version field to> indicate that I was using a snapshot rather than RC1 OOTB. Further to that request, please ignore/delete the existing Remarks. I have looked at 12 Solaris systems running 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, and 8. It looks as if my machine only has had a non-standard symlink made from libld.so.2 to libld.so in /usr/lib. This will be removed. As far as I can tell, libld.so.2 is used in a special way by ld rather than being a normal shared library. -- Pete Forman http://www.bedford.waii.com/wsdev/petef/PeteF_links.html WesternGeco http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef Manton Lane, Bedford, mailto:pete.forman@westerngeco.com MK41 7PA, UK tel:+44-1234-224798 fax:+44-1234-224804