Thread: RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?

RE: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates un ique constraint?

From
"Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
> > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
>
> Nope. It has been broken a long time...

Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
Hiroshi?
Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.

Vadim
2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3


Attachment

Re: RE: [GENERAL] update inside transaction violates unique constraint?

From
Hiroshi Inoue
Date:

"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:

> > > Btree doesn't take into account that tuple was just marked
> > > for update but still alive. Seems it was handled properly in 6.5.X ?
> >
> > Nope. It has been broken a long time...
>
> Hmm, as I remember, Hiroshi fixed something in this area for 7.0.X.
> Hiroshi?
> Probably, his fix somehow disappeared from CVS?
> Diff against 7.0.2 sources attached.
>
> Vadim
> 2 Marc - please add this to upcoming 7.0.3
>

Hmm,it seems that both current and REL7_0_PATCHES
have already been changed.
I committed the the change to current tree and
asked Tatsuo to commit it to REL7_0_PATCHES tree.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue