Thread: are subtransactions not nestable?

are subtransactions not nestable?

From
Christof Petig
Date:
Hello,

is it correct that a nesting of subtransactions is not possible with
postgres at the moment?
(I didn't find a TODO entry for this (even at 'exotic' features))

christof=> begin;
BEGIN
christof=> begin;
NOTICE:  BeginTransactionBlock and not in default state
BEGIN
christof=> commit;
END
christof=> commit;
NOTICE:  EndTransactionBlock and not inprogress/abort state
END

Regards  Christof




Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?

From
Thomas Lockhart
Date:
> is it correct that a nesting of subtransactions is not possible with
> postgres at the moment?
> (I didn't find a TODO entry for this (even at 'exotic' features))

There has been some discussion of this. The fact that it is disallowed
by SQL92 is *not* the reason we don't have the feature, but it may be
responsible for it not yet being done...
                  - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable?

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
> Hello,
> 
> is it correct that a nesting of subtransactions is not possible with
> postgres at the moment?
> (I didn't find a TODO entry for this (even at 'exotic' features))

We don't support it, but will add to TODO now.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026