Thread: RE: [HACKERS] User requests now that 6.5 is out
> > On 29-Jun-99 Jackson, DeJuan wrote: > > > Would a PostgreSQL / PHP solution be practical for the Feature/Bug > tracking? > > > (I'm thinking specifically of the mirrors here.) > > > -DEJ > > > > How 'bout JitterBug? http://samba.anu.edu.au/jitterbug/ > > or GNATS: http://www.cs.utah.edu/csinfo/texinfo/gnats/gnats.html > > I've tried GNATs, and didn't really like it...its worked effectively at > FreeBSD, but... > > Ouch, JitterBug looks painful :( > > I'm willing to install either, but I think that GNATs, from what I'm used > to of it, is the better one, since it allows for email based bug > reports... > Will it allow for feature requests as well as bug reports/updates?And how will this affect the mirrors? Do they have toinstall the same software? Will they get static bug report pages that they update once a day?I have no clue how the mirroring works. > > >> > Folks, > > >> > > > >> > Not sure if this is the right place to request this, but here are > some > > >> > things I, as a satisfied user of PostgreSQL, would like to see done > (and > > >> > I'd be glad to help where I can). All of these are just > suggestions > > >> > geared to the care and feeding of the PostgreSQL user community. > > >> > > >> These are all good ideas. The problem is getting someone to devote > the > > >> time to it. We normally focus on announcing features as they are > > >> completed, not tracking features and request counts. They would be > of > > >> value, but we have to weigh the value against actual development > time. > > >> > > >> It would certainly be nice to have all the things you mention, but > > >> considering our time is limited, I think we are properly allocating > the > > >> time we have. >
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Jackson, DeJuan wrote: > > > On 29-Jun-99 Jackson, DeJuan wrote: > > > > Would a PostgreSQL / PHP solution be practical for the Feature/Bug > > tracking? > > > > (I'm thinking specifically of the mirrors here.) > > > > -DEJ > > > > > > How 'bout JitterBug? http://samba.anu.edu.au/jitterbug/ > > > or GNATS: http://www.cs.utah.edu/csinfo/texinfo/gnats/gnats.html > > > > I've tried GNATs, and didn't really like it...its worked effectively at > > FreeBSD, but... > > > > Ouch, JitterBug looks painful :( > > > > I'm willing to install either, but I think that GNATs, from what I'm used > > to of it, is the better one, since it allows for email based bug > > reports... > > > Will it allow for feature requests as well as bug reports/updates? > And how will this affect the mirrors? Do they have to install the > same software? Will they get static bug report pages that they update once > a day? > I have no clue how the mirroring works. The mirrors are pretty much only those that are 'static'...anything using a database backend (or similar...ie. ht/Dig) are purely on the main site... > > > >> > Folks, > > > >> > > > > >> > Not sure if this is the right place to request this, but here are > > some > > > >> > things I, as a satisfied user of PostgreSQL, would like to see done > > (and > > > >> > I'd be glad to help where I can). All of these are just > > suggestions > > > >> > geared to the care and feeding of the PostgreSQL user community. > > > >> > > > >> These are all good ideas. The problem is getting someone to devote > > the > > > >> time to it. We normally focus on announcing features as they are > > > >> completed, not tracking features and request counts. They would be > > of > > > >> value, but we have to weigh the value against actual development > > time. > > > >> > > > >> It would certainly be nice to have all the things you mention, but > > > >> considering our time is limited, I think we are properly allocating > > the > > > >> time we have. > > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
Hi, How about Bugs, Features and Doc Requests Collector from Zope progect?http://www.zope.org/Collector/ Mikhail
Hi! On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Mikhail Terekhov wrote: > How about Bugs, Features and Doc Requests Collector from > Zope progect? > http://www.zope.org/Collector/ Collector is based on ZTable, which is commercial. DigiCool announced they will open ZTable Core sometime in the future, probably Collector will be open too. > Mikhail Oleg. ---- Oleg Broytmann http://members.xoom.com/phd2/ phd2@earthling.net Programmers don't die, they justGOSUB without RETURN.