Thread: INET and CIDR comparisons
I heard back from Paul Vixie and he says that it should be possible to store two values in a unique index if they differ only in netbits. I am sending a patch in. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
At 09:30 PM 6/1/99 -0400, D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain wrote: >I heard back from Paul Vixie and he says that it should be possible to >store two values in a unique index if they differ only in netbits. I >am sending a patch in. I've stayed out of this discussion, but Paul makes a lot of sense. They're NOT the same networks... - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > I heard back from Paul Vixie and he says that it should be possible to > store two values in a unique index if they differ only in netbits. This is definitely true. E.g., we have an in-house database which records internet address delegations wherein a.b.c.0/22 can be and often is the parent of a.b.c.0/23. They should definitely be recignized as unique from each other. > I am sending a patch in. Groovy. I'll be pestering the present developer of that database to uniquify the index. 8^) -- Todd Graham Lewis Postmaster, MindSpring Enterprises tlewis@mindspring.net (800) 719-4664, x22804 "A pint of sweat will save a gallon of blood." -- George S. Patton
> I heard back from Paul Vixie and he says that it should be possible to > store two values in a unique index if they differ only in netbits. I > am sending a patch in. Thanks. One more item I can remove from Open Items list. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
Thus spake Don Baccus > At 09:30 PM 6/1/99 -0400, D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain wrote: > >I heard back from Paul Vixie and he says that it should be possible to > >store two values in a unique index if they differ only in netbits. I > >am sending a patch in. > > I've stayed out of this discussion, but Paul makes a lot of > sense. They're NOT the same networks... Agreed. My only point was that using the fields was probably a bad idea anyway and, if you did, allowing both then made even less sense but that's more of design issue. In any case, if someone wants the protection, they can always add a unique index on host(field). -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.