Thread: Re: [ADMIN] maximum attribute record.

Re: [ADMIN] maximum attribute record.

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Has this been fixed in 6.5 beta?

> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 07:33:48PM +0800, Vikrant Rathore wrote:
> 
> > If your query is bigger than 8192 bytes then libpq simply truncates it
> > without giving any warning
> 
> I've read that in the docs, too (while back, didn't try it out). I have
> to say, though, that I think this behaviouur is somewhat less than optimal.
> Personally, I strongly prefer it if error conditions are raised by software
> when it isn't able to carry out the requested function.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] maximum attribute record.

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Has this been fixed in 6.5 beta?
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 07:33:48PM +0800, Vikrant Rathore wrote:
>> 
>>>> If your query is bigger than 8192 bytes then libpq simply truncates it
>>>> without giving any warning
>> 
>> I've read that in the docs, too (while back, didn't try it out).

That hasn't been true since at least 6.3.2:

/* check to see if the query string is too long */
if (strlen(query) > MAX_MESSAGE_LEN - 2)
{sprintf(conn->errorMessage, "PQsendQuery() -- query is too long.  "        "Maximum length is %d\n", MAX_MESSAGE_LEN -
2);return0;
 
}

Possibly the documentation needs updated, but all I can find is:

: Caveats
: 
: The query buffer is 8192 bytes long, and queries over that length will
: be rejected. 

Is there another place that says the wrong thing?
        regards, tom lane