Thread: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
> Anyhow, I'm about to start the test, using RELSEG_SIZE set to 243968 which> works out to be 1.6Gb. That should stay well away from the overflow problem. How about using 1 Gb. A lot of Unices have the ulimit set to 1 Gb by default. It would also be nice for the looks, easy to calculate size, nicer to storage managers, etc .... Andreas
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 wrote: > > Anyhow, I'm about to start the test, using RELSEG_SIZE set to > 243968 which > > works out to be 1.6Gb. That should stay well away from the > overflow problem. > > How about using 1 Gb. A lot of Unices have the ulimit set to 1 Gb by > default. > It would also be nice for the looks, easy to calculate size, nicer to > storage managers, > etc .... Could be an idea. How about making it a compile time option (like the blocksize), defaulting to 1Gb? Peter -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf