> Brett McCormick wrote:
> >
> > Can we have all the constants put in pg_type? In the implementation
> > of my perl PL language, some types I care about aren't defined so I
> > must define them myself, which seems dangerous (should they ever
> > change)
> >
> > On Fri, 27 February 1998, at 12:15:21, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote:
> >
> > > I like second way (and so - we should copy pg_type to ~pgsql/include or
> > > something like this) but it would be nice if you support more
> > > general 1st way too.
>
> We should do this.
Is there anything to prevent someone from deleting that function and
then recreating it? If that happens, it will then have a different oid.
darrenk
