Thread: Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX

Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX

From
darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)
Date:
> > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
> > away (since it is not allways defined),
> > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
> > wich also is not defined by gcc.
> > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
> > all compilers.
>
>     Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
>

I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
one underscore).

darrenk

Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX

From
The Hermit Hacker
Date:
On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Darren King wrote:

> > > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
> > > away (since it is not allways defined),
> > > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
> > > wich also is not defined by gcc.
> > > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
> > > all compilers.
> >
> >     Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
> >
>
> I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
> one underscore).

    Someone want to send me a patch to fix this?  or a list of files
that need to be changed?

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org