Thread: Upgrade from 9.4 -> 9.5, FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE, fails on initdb
$ initdb -D data-default
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "pgsql".
This user must also own the server process.
The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C".
The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "SQL_ASCII".
The default text search configuration will be set to "english".
Data page checksums are disabled.
fixing permissions on existing directory data-default ... ok
creating subdirectories ... ok
selecting default max_connections ... 10
selecting default shared_buffers ... 400kB
selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix
creating configuration files ... ok
creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: Invalid argument
DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600).
child process exited with exit code 1
initdb: removing contents of data directory "data-default"
$
$ sysctl -a|grep semm
kern.ipc.semmsl: 512
kern.ipc.semmnu: 256
kern.ipc.semmns: 512
kern.ipc.semmni: 256
The system is running 9.4 just fine and the kernel configuration requirements shouldn't have changed for semaphores.... should they?
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "pgsql".
This user must also own the server process.
The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C".
The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "SQL_ASCII".
The default text search configuration will be set to "english".
Data page checksums are disabled.
fixing permissions on existing directory data-default ... ok
creating subdirectories ... ok
selecting default max_connections ... 10
selecting default shared_buffers ... 400kB
selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix
creating configuration files ... ok
creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: Invalid argument
DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600).
child process exited with exit code 1
initdb: removing contents of data directory "data-default"
$
$ sysctl -a|grep semm
kern.ipc.semmsl: 512
kern.ipc.semmnu: 256
kern.ipc.semmns: 512
kern.ipc.semmni: 256
The system is running 9.4 just fine and the kernel configuration requirements shouldn't have changed for semaphores.... should they?
Attachment
On 02/04/2016 10:02 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > $ initdb -D data-default > The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "pgsql". > This user must also own the server process. > > The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C". > The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "SQL_ASCII". > The default text search configuration will be set to "english". > > Data page checksums are disabled. > > fixing permissions on existing directory data-default ... ok > creating subdirectories ... ok > selecting default max_connections ... 10 > selecting default shared_buffers ... 400kB > selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix > creating configuration files ... ok > creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not > create semaphores: Invalid argument > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600). > child process exited with exit code 1 > initdb: removing contents of data directory "data-default" > $ > $ sysctl -a|grep semm > kern.ipc.semmsl: 512 > kern.ipc.semmnu: 256 > kern.ipc.semmns: 512 > kern.ipc.semmni: 256 > > The system is running 9.4 just fine and the kernel configuration > requirements shouldn't have changed for semaphores.... should they? Where did the 9.5 version come from and was it the same source as the 9.4 version? > > -- > Karl Denninger > karl@denninger.net <mailto:karl@denninger.net> > /The Market Ticker/ > /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On 02/04/2016 10:02 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: > $ initdb -D data-default > The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "pgsql". > This user must also own the server process. > > The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C". > The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "SQL_ASCII". > The default text search configuration will be set to "english". > > Data page checksums are disabled. > > fixing permissions on existing directory data-default ... ok > creating subdirectories ... ok > selecting default max_connections ... 10 > selecting default shared_buffers ... 400kB > selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix > creating configuration files ... ok > creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not > create semaphores: Invalid argument > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600). > child process exited with exit code 1 > initdb: removing contents of data directory "data-default" > $ > $ sysctl -a|grep semm > kern.ipc.semmsl: 512 > kern.ipc.semmnu: 256 > kern.ipc.semmns: 512 > kern.ipc.semmni: 256 > > The system is running 9.4 just fine and the kernel configuration > requirements shouldn't have changed for semaphores.... should they? If it helps, the hint from the source code: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/port/sysv_sema.c;h=f6f15169200a03e9da46ae348994f04297d22017;hb=HEAD "This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores by reducing its max_connections parameter. The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about configuring your system for PostgreSQL." > > -- > Karl Denninger > karl@denninger.net <mailto:karl@denninger.net> > /The Market Ticker/ > /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> writes: > $ initdb -D data-default > ... > creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not > create semaphores: Invalid argument > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600). Hmm. On my Linux box, "man semget" says EINVAL means EINVAL nsems is less than 0 or greater than the limit on the number of semaphores per semaphore set (SEMMSL), or a semaphore set corre- sponding to key already exists, and nsems is larger than the number of semaphores in that set. which agrees with the POSIX spec. Is FreeBSD the same? Proceeding on the assumption that it is ... 17 is the same nsems value we've been using for donkey's years, so the SEMMSL aspect of this seems unlikely to apply; what presumably is happening is a collision with an existing semaphore's key. Our code is prepared for that, but it expects a different error code in such cases, either EEXIST or EACCES: /* * Fail quietly if error indicates a collision with existing set. One * would expect EEXIST, given that we said IPC_EXCL, but perhaps we * could get a permission violation instead? Also, EIDRM might occur * if an old set is slated for destruction but not gone yet. */ It sounds like your kernel is returning EINVAL in preference to any of those codes, which would be pretty broken. I do not want to make our code treat EINVAL as meaning we should retry with a different key, because if the problem is indeed the SEMMSL limit, we'd be in an infinite loop. You can probably get past this for the moment if you can remove the semaphore set with key 2, but I'd advise filing a FreeBSD kernel bug about their choice of errno. regards, tom lane
On 2/4/2016 12:28, Tom Lane wrote:
Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> writes:$ initdb -D data-default ... creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: Invalid argument DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600).Hmm. On my Linux box, "man semget" says EINVAL means EINVAL nsems is less than 0 or greater than the limit on the number of semaphores per semaphore set (SEMMSL), or a semaphore set corre- sponding to key already exists, and nsems is larger than the number of semaphores in that set. which agrees with the POSIX spec. Is FreeBSD the same? Proceeding on the assumption that it is ... 17 is the same nsems value we've been using for donkey's years, so the SEMMSL aspect of this seems unlikely to apply; what presumably is happening is a collision with an existing semaphore's key. Our code is prepared for that, but it expects a different error code in such cases, either EEXIST or EACCES: /* * Fail quietly if error indicates a collision with existing set. One * would expect EEXIST, given that we said IPC_EXCL, but perhaps we * could get a permission violation instead? Also, EIDRM might occur * if an old set is slated for destruction but not gone yet. */ It sounds like your kernel is returning EINVAL in preference to any of those codes, which would be pretty broken. I do not want to make our code treat EINVAL as meaning we should retry with a different key, because if the problem is indeed the SEMMSL limit, we'd be in an infinite loop. You can probably get past this for the moment if you can remove the semaphore set with key 2, but I'd advise filing a FreeBSD kernel bug about their choice of errno. regards, tom lane
That sounds like it well may be the problem....
s 65564 2 --rw-rw-rw- www www www www 3 12:29:14 7:56:04
Oh look, the web server process has a semaphore set out with a "2" key....
I've filed a bug report. Thanks.
Attachment
I wrote: > Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> writes: >> $ initdb -D data-default >> ... >> creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not >> create semaphores: Invalid argument >> DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600). > Hmm. On my Linux box, "man semget" says EINVAL means > EINVAL nsems is less than 0 or greater than the limit on the number of > semaphores per semaphore set (SEMMSL), or a semaphore set corre- > sponding to key already exists, and nsems is larger than the > number of semaphores in that set. > which agrees with the POSIX spec. Is FreeBSD the same? BTW, looking at the code, I see that during initdb we would have tried semaphore key 1 before 2. So presumably, on key 1 we got an error code that we recognized as meaning "semaphore set already exists", but then on key 2 we got EINVAL instead. That makes this even more curious. I'd be interested to see what "ipcs -s" says, if you have that command. (You might need to run it as root to be sure it will show all sempaphores.) regards, tom lane
On 2/4/2016 12:47, Tom Lane wrote:
There was indeed a "2" key out by the web server process; I shut it down and cleared it and the upgrade is now running....I wrote:Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> writes:$ initdb -D data-default ... creating template1 database in data-default/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: Invalid argument DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(2, 17, 03600).Hmm. On my Linux box, "man semget" says EINVAL meansEINVAL nsems is less than 0 or greater than the limit on the number of semaphores per semaphore set (SEMMSL), or a semaphore set corre- sponding to key already exists, and nsems is larger than the number of semaphores in that set.which agrees with the POSIX spec. Is FreeBSD the same?BTW, looking at the code, I see that during initdb we would have tried semaphore key 1 before 2. So presumably, on key 1 we got an error code that we recognized as meaning "semaphore set already exists", but then on key 2 we got EINVAL instead. That makes this even more curious. I'd be interested to see what "ipcs -s" says, if you have that command. (You might need to run it as root to be sure it will show all sempaphores.) regards, tom lane
Also filed a kernel bug with the FreeBSD folks against 10.2-STABLE as the man page says you should have gotten back EEXIST.