Thread: Attachments

Attachments

From
"FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)"
Date:

Dear all,

 

May I humble request that only plain text attachments should be posted. This safe guards everyone against  

from accidental viruses been added to the email in transit.  

 

Perhaps this should have been on the CoC for everyone’s safety.

 

Thank you.

 

Re: Attachments

From
John McKown
Date:
I prefer how the R mailing list works: No attachments of any kind and no HTML messages allowed. Just plain text email. If someone needs to supply something too large for a single email, they must put it on a Web site (such as GitHub, for example) and then include a URL for that. That is: (1) much safer for all; (2) saves bandwidth for uninterested users; (3) save space on the various archives. Yes, this is very "retro" of me. And only a personal opinion, not a commandment from on high.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:24 PM, FarjadFarid(ChkNet) <farjad.farid@checknetworks.com> wrote:

Dear all,

 

May I humble request that only plain text attachments should be posted. This safe guards everyone against  

from accidental viruses been added to the email in transit.  

 

Perhaps this should have been on the CoC for everyone’s safety.

 

Thank you.

 




--
Werner Heisenberg is driving down the autobahn. A police officer pulls
him over. The officer says, "Excuse me, sir, do you know how fast you
were going?"
"No," replies Dr. Heisenberg, "but I know where I am."

Computer Science is the only discipline in which we view adding a new wing to a building as being maintenance -- Jim Horning

Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted.

He's about as useful as a wax frying pan.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

Re: Attachments

From
Vick Khera
Date:

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:36 PM, John McKown <john.archie.mckown@gmail.com> wrote:
(3) save space on the various archives.

(4) loses historical information when the linked document goes away.

Re: Attachments

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> writes:
> (4) loses historical information when the linked document goes away.

Yeah.  Historically we've been very down on bug reports or patch
submissions that do not provide all the requested information right
in the message.  This is important for archival reasons.  The Postgres
mail archives go back nearly twenty years at this point, and we have
every expectation of still being around in another ten or twenty.
Very few outside URLs are likely to survive that long.

            regards, tom lane