Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: Pattern match against array elements?

Pattern match against array elements?

From
Israel Brewster
Date:
Is there any way to do a pattern match against the elements of an array in postgresql (9.4 if the version makes a
difference)?I have a grouped query that, among other things, returns an array of values, like: 

SELECT lognum, array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum;

Where the flightnum field is a varchar containing either a text string or a three-or-four digit number. Now say I want
toselect all logs that have a flight number starting with an '8' (so '800' or '8000' series flights). My first thought
wasto do something like this: 

SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like
ANY(flightnums);

But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results. I'm guessing that this is because the
wildcardis on the left of the operator, and needs to be on the right. Of course, turning it around to be: 

WHERE ANY(flightnum) like '8%'

gives me a syntax error. So is there any way I can run this query such that I get any rows containing a flight number
thatstarts with an 8 (or whatever)? 

-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
dinesh kumar
Date:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net> wrote:
Is there any way to do a pattern match against the elements of an array in postgresql (9.4 if the version makes a difference)? I have a grouped query that, among other things, returns an array of values, like:

SELECT lognum, array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum;

Where the flightnum field is a varchar containing either a text string or a three-or-four digit number. Now say I want to select all logs that have a flight number starting with an '8' (so '800' or '8000' series flights). My first thought was to do something like this:

SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);

But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results. I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the operator, and needs to be on the right. Of course, turning it around to be:

WHERE ANY(flightnum) like '8%'

gives me a syntax error. So is there any way I can run this query such that I get any rows containing a flight number that starts with an 8 (or whatever)?

 
Are you looking for this ?
 
SELECT lognum array_agg(flightnum) FROM logs WHERE flightnum ~ '^8' GROUP BY lognum;
 
 
 
-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Jeff Janes
Date:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net> wrote:
Is there any way to do a pattern match against the elements of an array in postgresql (9.4 if the version makes a difference)? I have a grouped query that, among other things, returns an array of values, like:

SELECT lognum, array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum;

Where the flightnum field is a varchar containing either a text string or a three-or-four digit number. Now say I want to select all logs that have a flight number starting with an '8' (so '800' or '8000' series flights). My first thought was to do something like this:

SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);

But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results. I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the operator, and needs to be on the right.

Right.  The LIKE operator does not have a commutator by default.  (And if you created one for it, it could not use an index in this case.)
 
Of course, turning it around to be:

WHERE ANY(flightnum) like '8%'

gives me a syntax error. So is there any way I can run this query such that I get any rows containing a flight number that starts with an 8 (or whatever)?

I think you're best bet is to do a subquery against the unaggregated table.

select * from aggregated a where exists 
  (select 1 from unaggregated ua where a.lognum=ua.lognum and flightnum like '8%')


This is a common problem.  If you find a better solution, I'd love to hear it!

Cheers,

Jeff

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>
> wrote:
>> My first thought was to do something like this:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs
>> GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);
>>
>> But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results.
>> I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the
>> operator, and needs to be on the right.

> Right.  The LIKE operator does not have a commutator by default.  (And if
> you created one for it, it could not use an index in this case.)

Well, it couldn't use an index anyway, given that the query as written
wants to collect groups if *any* member is LIKE '8%', rather than
restricting the data to such flightnums before aggregation occurs.

Personally I'd suggest building a commutator operator (just need a
one-liner SQL or plpgsql function as infrastructure) and away you go.

> I think you're best bet is to do a subquery against the unaggregated table.

> select * from aggregated a where exists
>   (select 1 from unaggregated ua where a.lognum=ua.lognum and flightnum
> like '8%')

That would work too, but not sure about performance relative to the other
way.

            regards, tom lane

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Israel Brewster
Date:
In the general case, that might work, however in my actually use case the inner SQL query (and underlying table structure) is rather more complicated, making it so I really want the WHERE clause in an outside query, as in my (non-functional) example. Just to clarify, the actual structure of the query is more like this:

SELECT 
<bunch of columns>
FROM
(SELECT
<some columns>
(SELECT
array_agg(flightnum)
FROM legdetails
WHERE logid=logs.id) as flightnums --this is where the array comes from that I want to filter on.
FROM logs
<joins with other tables>
) s1
WHERE
<filter on flightnums beginning with here>
<possible other filters here>
ORDER BY <whatever>

So the query is noticeably different than the one I original gave, but the end result is the same: an array in an inner query, and trying to filter based on the contents of the array. Sorry if I confused the issue by trying to simplify the concept too much.
-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------



On Oct 12, 2015, at 10:14 AM, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net> wrote:
Is there any way to do a pattern match against the elements of an array in postgresql (9.4 if the version makes a difference)? I have a grouped query that, among other things, returns an array of values, like:

SELECT lognum, array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum;

Where the flightnum field is a varchar containing either a text string or a three-or-four digit number. Now say I want to select all logs that have a flight number starting with an '8' (so '800' or '8000' series flights). My first thought was to do something like this:

SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);

But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results. I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the operator, and needs to be on the right. Of course, turning it around to be:

WHERE ANY(flightnum) like '8%'

gives me a syntax error. So is there any way I can run this query such that I get any rows containing a flight number that starts with an 8 (or whatever)?

 
Are you looking for this ?
 
SELECT lognum array_agg(flightnum) FROM logs WHERE flightnum ~ '^8' GROUP BY lognum;
 
 
 
-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--

Attachment

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Israel Brewster
Date:
On Oct 12, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>
>> wrote:
>>> My first thought was to do something like this:
>>>
>>> SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs
>>> GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);
>>>
>>> But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results.
>>> I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the
>>> operator, and needs to be on the right.
>
>> Right.  The LIKE operator does not have a commutator by default.  (And if
>> you created one for it, it could not use an index in this case.)
>
> Well, it couldn't use an index anyway, given that the query as written
> wants to collect groups if *any* member is LIKE '8%', rather than
> restricting the data to such flightnums before aggregation occurs.
>
> Personally I'd suggest building a commutator operator (just need a
> one-liner SQL or plpgsql function as infrastructure) and away you go.

That could work. I'll look into that.

>
>> I think you're best bet is to do a subquery against the unaggregated table.
>
>> select * from aggregated a where exists
>>  (select 1 from unaggregated ua where a.lognum=ua.lognum and flightnum
>> like '8%')
>
> That would work too, but not sure about performance relative to the other
> way.
>
>             regards, tom lane


-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Jeff Janes
Date:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>
> wrote:
>> My first thought was to do something like this:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs
>> GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);
>>
>> But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results.
>> I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the
>> operator, and needs to be on the right.

> Right.  The LIKE operator does not have a commutator by default.  (And if
> you created one for it, it could not use an index in this case.)

Well, it couldn't use an index anyway, given that the query as written
wants to collect groups if *any* member is LIKE '8%', rather than
restricting the data to such flightnums before aggregation occurs.

I was jumping ahead a bit here.  I was thinking of the case where the aggregation query was made a materialized view with a gin index on the aggregated column.  It is not obvious that a "scalar operator ANY(flightnums)" can't use an index on array_column, but it can't.  My interest was more in the % operator from pg_trgm, but also the normal text = operator would be nice to use here (as opposed to the much uglier <@ or @> in which the scalar needs to be wrapped into a degenerate array.)
 


Personally I'd suggest building a commutator operator (just need a
one-liner SQL or plpgsql function as infrastructure) and away you go.

Right, something like:

create function like_rev (text, text) returns boolean as $$ select $2 like $1 $$ language SQL;

create operator ~~~~ (procedure = like_rev,  leftarg=text, rightarg=text);

You can explicitly specify the commutator but it doesn't seem to be necessary to do so:

create operator ~~~~ (procedure = like_rev,  leftarg=text, rightarg=text,commutator = ~~ );



> I think you're best bet is to do a subquery against the unaggregated table.

> select * from aggregated a where exists
>   (select 1 from unaggregated ua where a.lognum=ua.lognum and flightnum
> like '8%')

That would work too, but not sure about performance relative to the other
way.

In my experience, if the subselect can use an index on the LIKE and if '8%' is rare, then using the subselect will be vastly better.  And if it is indexable or not rare, it is still likely to be better, or at least not worse by much. Disaggregating every array for every row to do the ANY is pretty inefficient.  Particularly if you are not using a materialized view, and so have to first aggregate it.

Of course good enough is good enough, so if scalar ~~~~ ANY(array)  is good enough...
 
Cheers,

Jeff

Re: Pattern match against array elements?

From
Israel Brewster
Date:

-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------



On Oct 12, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>
> wrote:
>> My first thought was to do something like this:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM (SELECT lognum,array_agg(flightnum) as flightnums FROM logs
>> GROUP BY lognum) s1 WHERE '8%' like ANY(flightnums);
>>
>> But while this doesn't give an error, it also doesn't return any results.
>> I'm guessing that this is because the wildcard is on the left of the
>> operator, and needs to be on the right.

> Right.  The LIKE operator does not have a commutator by default.  (And if
> you created one for it, it could not use an index in this case.)

Well, it couldn't use an index anyway, given that the query as written
wants to collect groups if *any* member is LIKE '8%', rather than
restricting the data to such flightnums before aggregation occurs.

I was jumping ahead a bit here.  I was thinking of the case where the aggregation query was made a materialized view with a gin index on the aggregated column.  It is not obvious that a "scalar operator ANY(flightnums)" can't use an index on array_column, but it can't.  My interest was more in the % operator from pg_trgm, but also the normal text = operator would be nice to use here (as opposed to the much uglier <@ or @> in which the scalar needs to be wrapped into a degenerate array.)
 


Personally I'd suggest building a commutator operator (just need a
one-liner SQL or plpgsql function as infrastructure) and away you go.

Right, something like:

create function like_rev (text, text) returns boolean as $$ select $2 like $1 $$ language SQL;

create operator ~~~~ (procedure = like_rev,  leftarg=text, rightarg=text);

...which actually works perfectly for my use case. No, it doesn't use an index, however even the worst case scenario on my data, where that is the ONLY criteria given, "only" takes about 10 seconds. Yes, that is a "long" time, however a) 99% of the time there will be other criteria used as well, drastically reducing the result set and speeding the query, and b) the query is used as part of a report generator, for which there isn't really a problem if the user has to wait a few seconds. 


You can explicitly specify the commutator but it doesn't seem to be necessary to do so:

create operator ~~~~ (procedure = like_rev,  leftarg=text, rightarg=text,commutator = ~~ );



> I think you're best bet is to do a subquery against the unaggregated table.

> select * from aggregated a where exists
>   (select 1 from unaggregated ua where a.lognum=ua.lognum and flightnum
> like '8%')

That would work too, but not sure about performance relative to the other
way.

In my experience, if the subselect can use an index on the LIKE and if '8%' is rare, then using the subselect will be vastly better.  And if it is indexable or not rare, it is still likely to be better, or at least not worse by much. Disaggregating every array for every row to do the ANY is pretty inefficient.  Particularly if you are not using a materialized view, and so have to first aggregate it.

Of course good enough is good enough, so if scalar ~~~~ ANY(array)  is good enough...

Exactly. I think I could make the sub-select work, with some tweaking, and as it could well improve performance noticeably I may well spend some time on it, but the commutator operator "just works" and integrates quite nicely with my existing query structure.

Thanks for the help!

 
Cheers,

Jeff

Attachment