Thread: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)
Message Digest
Volume 1 : Issue 8030 : "index" Format
Messages in this Issue:
200803/1324: Re: casting from integer to boolean
200803/1325: Re: casting from integer to boolean
200803/1326: Re: casting from integer to boolean
200803/1327: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1328: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1329: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3
200803/1330: Re: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3
200803/1331: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1332: Re: IBM investing in EnterpriseDB
200803/1333: Re: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3
200803/1334: Re: IBM investing in EnterpriseDB
200803/1335: Re: IBM investing in EnterpriseDB
200803/1336: driver version
200803/1337: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1338: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1339: Re: casting from integer to boolean
200803/1340: Re: psql /usr/lib/libgcc dependency in pg 8.3
200803/1341: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)
200803/1342: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)
200803/1343: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb,
createuser...)
200803/1344: Re: [Mono-list] NauckIT PostgreSQL provider working with Mono?
200803/1345: Using tables in other PostGreSQL database
pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org wrote: > Message Digest > Volume 1 : Issue 8030 : "index" Format > > Messages in this Issue: > 200803/1324: Re: casting from integer to boolean > 200803/1325: Re: casting from integer to boolean > 200803/1326: Re: casting from integer to boolean > 200803/1327: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, > createuser...) > 200803/1328: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, > createuser...) [snip] I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration change that I need to go personalize? Thanks. Colin
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <cww@denterprises.org> wrote: > I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this > morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration > change that I need to go personalize? I was wondering the same thing, but don't see an option regarding digests... Brett
"Brett Hoerner" <bretthoerner@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <cww@denterprises.org> wrote:
>> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this
>> morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration
>> change that I need to go personalize?
> I was wondering the same thing, but don't see an option regarding digests...
Did you look closely at the Received: history of the messages?
We occasionally get incidents where someone's broken mail software
regurgitates delayed copies of list mail, either back to the list
daemon (which is usually successful at recognizing duplicates, but
not always) or directly to people named in the From: or To: or CC:
lines of the mail. To no one's surprise, the mail software that
does this is invariably Microsoft's.
Regurgitating list mail is grounds for ejection from the lists,
if we can figure out who's doing it (it will probably not surprise you
to learn that M$' broken software often makes it hard to figure out
which list subscriber is responsible).
If you get multiple duplicates, and their headers show that they
went through some unexpected places between postgresql.org and you,
send 'em to the list owner (eg, pgsql-general-owner at postgresql.org)
for possible action.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brett Hoerner" <bretthoerner@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee
>> <cww@denterprises.org> wrote:
>>> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early
>>> this morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new
>>> configuration change that I need to go personalize?
>
>> I was wondering the same thing, but don't see an option regarding
>> digests...
>
> Did you look closely at the Received: history of the messages?
>
> We occasionally get incidents where someone's broken mail software
> regurgitates delayed copies of list mail, either back to the list
> daemon (which is usually successful at recognizing duplicates, but
> not always) or directly to people named in the From: or To: or CC:
> lines of the mail. To no one's surprise, the mail software that does
> this is invariably Microsoft's.
Hmm, it doesn't seem to have to do with duplicates, since the eight
digests were different. On the other hand, I think you're probably
right about the these being related to bounces.
The following are the Received headers from before the list daemon sent
me the first digest.
Received: from marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (gdl.cinvestav.mx [148.247.21.3])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7092E0030
for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:37:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 7DCB42080EF39; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:34:40 -0600 (CST)
Received: from maia-1.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170CC20099FA3
for <joel.espinosa@cts-design.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:17:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by maia-1.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E7DB6780;
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:16:56 -0300 (ADT)
Perhaps <joel.espinosa@cts-design.com> is the culprit here. I'm CCing
owner on this message.
Thanks for the suggestion, Tom.
Colin
Tom Lane wrote:
>"Brett Hoerner" <bretthoerner@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee <cww@denterprises.org> wrote:
>>> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early this
>>> morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new configuration
>>> change that I need to go personalize?
>
>> I was wondering the same thing, but don't see an option regarding digests...
>
>Did you look closely at the Received: history of the messages?
They turned up on usenet as well (see below). Seems like
<joel.espinosa@cts-design.com> has a problem.
Rainer
Path: news.hub.org!postgresql.org!pgsql-general-owner+m130868
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
Newsgroups: pgsql.general
Subject: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:56:10 -0300
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 38
Sender: news@news.hub.org
Message-ID: <20080327091344.D0D25DB6A94@maia-1.hub.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.hub.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.hub.org 1206832273 86042 200.46.204.72 (29 Mar 2008 23:11:13
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:11:13 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220])
by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2TNBDuJ086034
for <pgsql-general@news.hub.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:11:13 -0300
(ADT)
(envelope-from pgsql-general-owner+m130868@postgresql.org)
X-Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0121A1688661
for <pgsql-general@news.hub.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:11:18 -0300
(ADT)
X-Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220])
by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 61755-02 for <pgsql-general@news.hub.org>;
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:11:10 -0300 (ADT)
X-Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB711688644
for <pgsql-general@news.hub.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:11:17 -0300
(ADT)
X-Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2202E0031
for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008
15:43:10 -0300 (ADT)
X-Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 69425-02 for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:43:03 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Received: from marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (gdl.cinvestav.mx [148.247.21.3])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EE22E0030
for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:43:03 -0300
(ADT)
X-Received: by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 9F5A92080FE02; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:41:55 -0600 (CST)
X-Received: from maia-1.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7D02056B5CE
for <joel.espinosa@cts-design.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:13:48 -0600
(CST)
X-Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by maia-1.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D25DB6A94;
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:13:44 -0300 (ADT)
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420)
X-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general
X-Precedence: bulk
X-Cinvestav-CTS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-MailScanner-ID: 9F5A92080FE02.C88E5
X-Cinvestav-CTS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Cinvestav-CTS-MailScanner-From: root@marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general
X-List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general>
X-List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
X-List-ID: <pgsql-general.postgresql.org>
X-List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org>
X-List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
X-List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-general>
X-List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>
X-Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.hub.org pgsql.general:58447