Thread: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.

Anyone have Experience with this h/w+s/w combo?  It will be used as
a "history server", so sub-second transaction times are not required.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFErc01S9HxQb37XmcRAlqTAJ93VOeCvDnJ8gx+I19ZjfKP0Vmw2ACbBR6g
UjmZtvoGGryHTf1OVttRdEY=
=1Lcc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
> DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
> with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.

I recently speced this exact hardware for a customer. When the customer called
HP to order, HP told them that it is not appropriate for a database. They
cited shorter life of the SATA drives and overall performance.

Is it true? I don't know. I have used SATA enclosures for databases for
sometime and have been quite happy with them.

You may also to look at the ml30 which is SCSI.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Anyone have Experience with this h/w+s/w combo?  It will be used as
> a "history server", so sub-second transaction times are not required.

--
   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/



Re: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thursday 06 July 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
>> DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
>> with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.
>
> I recently speced this exact hardware for a customer. When the customer called
> HP to order, HP told them that it is not appropriate for a database. They
> cited shorter life of the SATA drives and overall performance.
>
> Is it true? I don't know. I have used SATA enclosures for databases for
> sometime and have been quite happy with them.
>
> You may also to look at the ml30 which is SCSI.

Thanks.  SCSI, though, would push the costs excessively high.

We have a Hitachi 9500 (really a DF600F) SAN, with SATA disks in it,
as well as an older SCSI SAN, and the DF600F works well.  We've had
it for at least 2 years (time loses all meaning when you're a
corporate drone...), and TTBOMK, it doesn't suffer abnormal disk deaths.

What SCSI hba did you spec?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEreHOS9HxQb37XmcRAvhzAKDDuegj4JnqdS9e5z25yHES5oe8BgCeNfs0
JiucGk7JTK0kYKus1q6YPZg=
=vVoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: The HP MSA20 SATA-SCSI enclosure

From
Ron Johnson
Date:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/06 23:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thursday 06 July 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Being an HP/Compaq shop, I'm looking at an Opteron-and-SATA-based
>> DL145 G2 and an MSA20 SATA enclosure with a U320 interface to use
>> with RHES4 and PostgreSQL.
>
> I recently speced this exact hardware for a customer. When the customer called
> HP to order, HP told them that it is not appropriate for a database. They
> cited shorter life of the SATA drives and overall performance.
>
> Is it true? I don't know. I have used SATA enclosures for databases for
> sometime and have been quite happy with them.
>
> You may also to look at the ml30 which is SCSI.

Anyone else have experience with the MSA20 or the SmartArray 6404?

>> Anyone have Experience with this h/w+s/w combo?  It will be used as
>> a "history server", so sub-second transaction times are not required.

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFOGbMS9HxQb37XmcRAn6CAKDjs+0sOT72lWcFgAJ9wnwdv1EqrACaA3zD
9b8CQL5ckn4BtrJJvUdc2iw=
=tswq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----