Thread: Operator Class for Hash
Hi All,
Could someone please help me out with an example on how to define an operator and operator class that supports hash joins? I’ve tried to follow the instructions in the documentation for v8.1 but I’m obviously doing something wrong, because the engine crashes on an operation that tries to use the operator.
Here is what I have:
CREATE OPERATOR < (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_lt, commutator = >, negator = >=, restrict = scalarltsel, join = scalarltjoinsel, HASHES);
CREATE OPERATOR <= (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_le, commutator = >=, negator = >, restrict = scalarltsel, join = scalarltjoinsel, HASHES, sort1 = <, sort2 = <);
CREATE OPERATOR = (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_eq, commutator = =, negator = <>, restrict = eqsel, join = eqjoinsel, HASHES, sort1 = <, sort2 = <);
CREATE OPERATOR >= (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_ge, commutator = <=, negator = <, restrict = scalargtsel, join = scalargtjoinsel, HASHES, sort1 = <, sort2 = <);
CREATE OPERATOR > (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_gt, commutator = <, negator = <=, restrict = scalargtsel, join = scalargtjoinsel, HASHES, sort1 = <, sort2 = <);
CREATE OPERATOR <> (leftarg = mytype, rightarg = mytype, procedure = mytype_ne, commutator = <>, negator = =, restrict = neqsel, join = neqjoinsel, HASHES, sort1 = <, sort2 = <);
CREATE OPERATOR CLASS mytype_ops DEFAULT FOR TYPE mytype USING btree AS
OPERATOR 1 <,
OPERATOR 2 <=,
OPERATOR 3 =,
OPERATOR 4 >=,
OPERATOR 5 >,
FUNCTION 1 mytype_comp(mytype, mytype);
CREATE OPERATOR CLASS mytype_ops DEFAULT FOR TYPE mytype USING hash AS
OPERATOR 1 =,
FUNCTION 1 mytype_comp(mytype, mytype);
Thank you for the help!
"Jozsef Szalay" <jszalay@storediq.com> writes: > Could someone please help me out with an example on how to define an > operator and operator class that supports hash joins? Well, for starters, only the equality operator should be marked HASHES, and the support function for a hash opclass is completely different from the one for a btree opclass. regards, tom lane