Thread: Possible move away from PG
I work for a college and we use PG currently as our main backend. We are currently developing with Java. We are considering moving away from postgres for the reasons I am going to list below. I would appreciate some thoughts from the Postgres community on way we should or shouldn't leave postgres. 1. Our dev plan involves alot of stored procedures to be used and we have found the way this is done in PG to be painful. (ie. To return multiple record from different tables you have to define a type. This is a pain to maintain because if you ever have to change what it returns it cannot be dropped because of dependencies etc.. In some other databases you can simpley write a stored proc to return whatever the query inside returns and this is handled dynamically) 2. Also with stored procs it is painful to return mulitple records. The syntax is more complicated than some other databases. (We are currently using PL/SQL) 3. The tools. PgAdmin does some things well but it is lacking the features of some of the other gui tools. This is not a big deal as we do also have PgManage which is acceptable except I personally don't like it cause it doesn't run in Linux and the Linux version is pretty bad. Thank you for any input and help, Jason Tesser
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Jason Tesser wrote: > 1. Our dev plan involves alot of stored procedures to be used and we > have found the way this is done in PG to be painful. (ie. To return > multiple record from different tables you have to define a type. This > is a pain to maintain because if you ever have to change what it returns > it cannot be dropped because of dependencies etc.. In some other > databases you can simpley write a stored proc to return whatever the > query inside returns and this is handled dynamically) Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type. Kris Jurka
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how this could help? <snip> > > Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type. > > Kris Jurka -- Jason Tesser Developer for NMI jtesser@nbbc.edu Eph 2:8-10
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how
this could help?
<snip>
>
> Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type.
>
> Kris Jurka
--
Jason Tesser
Developer for NMI
jtesser@nbbc.edu
Eph 2:8-10
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
--
> There are a lot of us out there who both do and do not work for Sun
Wow! Quantum programmers!
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how
this could help?
<snip>
>
> Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type.
>
> Kris Jurka
--
Jason Tesser
Developer for NMI
jtesser@nbbc.edu
Eph 2:8-10
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
Ok. This sounds good to me but I have one question> In the manual for 8.0 with comments someone commented at the end of the section on frecursors that they need to be closed which the manual didn’t seem to mention will this be a problem with doing this in java?
From: Pablo Baena [mailto:pbaena@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:30 PM
To: Jason Tesser
Cc: Pgsql
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Possible move away from PG
If found this article of help: http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/08/13/stored_procedures.html?page=2
On 6/30/05, Jason Tesser <jtesser@nbbc.edu> wrote:
I am not familar with how to do this. Could you give me an example of how
this could help?
<snip>
>
> Have you considered returing refcursors instead of setof some type.
>
> Kris Jurka
--
Jason Tesser
Developer for NMI
jtesser@nbbc.edu
Eph 2:8-10
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
--
> There are a lot of us out there who both do and do not work for Sun
Wow! Quantum programmers!