Thread: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Greg Stark
Date:
I regularly do a pg_dump -s and store the file in CVS. Normally I briefly look
over the diff before committing so I can describe the changes. This latest
time I observed a strange behaviour.

7.4.6 pg_dump seems to be inserting a lot more SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION lines
than previously. Before almost every object even when the owner is the same as
before, whereas previously pg_dump only emitted them when the owner changed.

I'm not exactly sure which version I had generated the previous dump with, but
it was definitely a 7.4.x version. I don't see any changes related to this in
the release notes since the 7.4 release notes.

It's not causing me any problems aside from an overly chatty CVS diff. But I
thought I would mention it in case it was an unintended change.

--
greg

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> 7.4.6 pg_dump seems to be inserting a lot more SET SESSION
> AUTHORIZATION lines than previously.

By "previously" do you mean 7.4.5 or thereabouts?  I can't recall any
late-7.4.* changes that might affect this.  pg_dump is supposed to
optimize away redundant SET SESSION AUTH commands.  Can you give a
specific example of what you are seeing?

            regards, tom lane

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Greg Stark
Date:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > 7.4.6 pg_dump seems to be inserting a lot more SET SESSION
> > AUTHORIZATION lines than previously.
>
> By "previously" do you mean 7.4.5 or thereabouts?

I think I went from 7.4.2 to 7.4.6. But I'm having trouble finding any records
to back this up. postgres.log doesn't include the version when it starts up,
and debian's installer tool doesn't leave an audit trail of upgrades
(something that I've often been annoyed at).

> I can't recall any late-7.4.* changes that might affect this. pg_dump is
> supposed to optimize away redundant SET SESSION AUTH commands. Can you give
> a specific example of what you are seeing?

I'm sorry, I have to remove the actual identifiers from the schema excerpt
before posting it. I replaced everything interesting by ellipses below. It
seems the spurious SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION commands appear after any
REVOKE/GRANT pair.


SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
);
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
);
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT INSERT,SELECT,UPDATE,DELETE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
);
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT INSERT,SELECT,UPDATE,DELETE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE TABLE ... (
...
);
-- Name: ...; Type: ACL; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
REVOKE ALL ON TABLE ... FROM PUBLIC;
GRANT SELECT,UPDATE ON TABLE ... TO dbuser;
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION 'dbo';
-- Name: ...; Type: SEQUENCE; Schema: public; Owner: dbo
CREATE SEQUENCE ...
...



--
greg

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Marco Colombo
Date:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
>> 7.4.6 pg_dump seems to be inserting a lot more SET SESSION
>> AUTHORIZATION lines than previously.
>
> By "previously" do you mean 7.4.5 or thereabouts?  I can't recall any
> late-7.4.* changes that might affect this.  pg_dump is supposed to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Maybe this one, from 7.4.4 relnotes?

- pg_dump handled ACLs with grant options incorrectly

> optimize away redundant SET SESSION AUTH commands.  Can you give a
> specific example of what you are seeing?
>
>             regards, tom lane

.TM.
--
       ____/  ____/   /
      /      /       /            Marco Colombo
     ___/  ___  /   /              Technical Manager
    /          /   /             ESI s.r.l.
  _____/ _____/  _/               Colombo@ESI.it

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> It seems the spurious SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION commands appear after any
> REVOKE/GRANT pair.

Oh, right.  In order to handle grants with GRANT OPTION, the dump data
may need to include SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION commands; so the code
assumes that it doesn't know the authorization any more after emitting
an ACL entry.  Not a bug.  It could possibly be smarter (eg grep the
text for "SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION" before deciding this) but since
that's not the default mode anymore anyway, I'm not very concerned.

            regards, tom lane

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Greg Stark
Date:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > It seems the spurious SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION commands appear after any
> > REVOKE/GRANT pair.
>
> Oh, right.  In order to handle grants with GRANT OPTION, the dump data
> may need to include SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION commands; so the code
> assumes that it doesn't know the authorization any more after emitting
> an ACL entry.  Not a bug.  It could possibly be smarter (eg grep the
> text for "SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION" before deciding this)

Wouldn't it make more sense to have a global state variable that held the
current user and anyone invoking SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION has to set that
state variable?

Or have a function responsible for emitting SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION and bar
other functions from doing it manually. Then have a local static variable in
that function responsible for keeping state.

> but since that's not the default mode anymore anyway, I'm not very
> concerned.

What's not the default mode? I'm just running "pg_dump -U postgresql -s db"

--
greg

Re: Bug in pg_dump in 7.4.6?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
>> but since that's not the default mode anymore anyway, I'm not very
>> concerned.

> What's not the default mode? I'm just running "pg_dump -U postgresql -s db"

As of 8.0, I meant.

            regards, tom lane