we're discussing it on -advocacy, and "some facts wrong" ranks as *the*
understatement of the week :) There are more facts wrong on it then there
are right :(
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Magnus Naeslund(t) wrote:
> Has anyone read this?:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/78285/
>
> It seems that it has some facts wrong about postgresql in there, for
> example it claims that postgresql doesn't have rowlevel locking,
> deadlock detection, or even encryption (i think protocol security here).
>
> This might be an interesting read, and i think someone from the
> marketing lists/group should send them an friendly mail pointing out any
> wrong facts, i don't feel too sure about what (more) they might have
> gotten wrong.
>
> Regards
> Magnus
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
