Thread: Re: Contrib question

Re: Contrib question

From
"Dann Corbit"
Date:
Of course I meant that is contained in "vacuumlo" --> stupid spell
checker auto-corrected it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dann Corbit
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 2:24 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Contrib question


Is there any functionality contained in vacuum that is not contained in
pg_autovacuum?

Suggestion:
Modify the base schema for tables and add a timestamp column for the
last vacuum operation, and a timestamp for the last vacuum analyze.
Finally, a timestamp for the last time that the data was modified via
insert update or delete would be handy (but I realize that this
timestamp might be problematic).

With that data, a crude autovacuum could be generated periodically
whether or not statistics were enabled.

Re: Contrib question

From
"Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
On Monday 29 March 2004 05:24 pm, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Of course I meant that is contained in "vacuumlo" --> stupid spell

I have never worked with large objects in postgresql and I have no idea what
is different with vacuumlo.  Suggestions or thoughts anyone?

Matthew