Thread: lo_copy()
I wonder if anyone has any comments on this [psuedo] code: new loid := SELECT lo_creat(131072 + 262144); UPDATE pg_largeobject SET data = (SELECT data FROM pg_largeobject WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno = 0) WHERE loid = <new loid> AND pageno = 0; INSERT INTO pg_largeobject (loid, pageno, data) (SELECT <new loid>, pageno, data FROM pg_largeobject WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno > 0 ); It does seem to work but I wouldn't like to swear it's safe, hence this posting. I was originally looking for a newoid() function to use, then thought about wrapping my own seeing as there wasn't one but then spotted there were some lo_ functions available. Therefore, lo_creat() I'm really just using to grab a new oid for the new large object. -- Nigel J. Andrews
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes: > I wonder if anyone has any comments on this [psuedo] code: > new loid := SELECT lo_creat(131072 + 262144); > UPDATE pg_largeobject SET > data = (SELECT data > FROM pg_largeobject > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno = 0) > WHERE loid = <new loid> AND pageno = 0; > INSERT INTO pg_largeobject > (loid, pageno, data) > (SELECT <new loid>, pageno, data > FROM pg_largeobject > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno > 0 > ); I believe this will work, but it requires superuser privileges to scribble on pg_largeobject directly. Probably would be better to go through the gruntwork of creating a fully supported lo_copy() operation. regards, tom lane
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes: > > I wonder if anyone has any comments on this [psuedo] code: > > > new loid := SELECT lo_creat(131072 + 262144); > > > UPDATE pg_largeobject SET > > data = (SELECT data > > FROM pg_largeobject > > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno = 0) > > WHERE loid = <new loid> AND pageno = 0; > > > INSERT INTO pg_largeobject > > (loid, pageno, data) > > (SELECT <new loid>, pageno, data > > FROM pg_largeobject > > WHERE loid = <source loid> AND pageno > 0 > > ); > > I believe this will work, but it requires superuser privileges to > scribble on pg_largeobject directly. Probably would be better to go > through the gruntwork of creating a fully supported lo_copy() operation. > > regards, tom lane > Thanks Tom, I was just a little worried that the page 0 record contained some housekeeping type data that really shouldn't be copied from another page 0. I noticed the scribbling on pg_largeobject priviledge and had created the function with '...INVOKE AS DEFINER...' with a switch into superuser just for that function's definition. Apart from making it more suitable for inclusion in the main distribution, and possibly speed, I'm not sure what recoding in C gives me given that I'm happy at the moment to do it this way. I may look into a C version for submision later. -- Nigel J. Andrews