Thread: mailing list archives
I guess the mailing list archives are slow to keep up with the list itself? I was having trouble getting mail on the list because it turns out the list was delivered from a different mail server than the subscription confirms, and it has a different name. I had postgresql.org whitelisted but I did not have pgsql.com whitelisted, or even know about it. So I posted by earlier and didn't see it come back. I checked the archives. Fixed the whitelist. Got Tom Lane's reply and replied back. Still nothing in archives. So I do not know if I missed any other replies. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ | | phil-nospam@ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net> writes:
> I guess the mailing list archives are slow to keep up with the list itself?
Yeah, there seems to be a day or so's delay before stuff appears in the
archives. Dunno why. (Marc?)
regards, tom lane
Odd, I have the script running once ever 6 hours to get the archives up to date ... I just added some code so that the script wouldn't get hung up on waiting for the search engine indexer to finish, so that mhonarc can run several times per day properly ... Let me know if that helps ... On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net> writes: > > I guess the mailing list archives are slow to keep up with the list itself? > > Yeah, there seems to be a day or so's delay before stuff appears in the > archives. Dunno why. (Marc?) > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
FYI, I just looked through 1/2 dozen of the archives, and none showed postings newer than the 11th. Robert Treat On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:35, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Odd, I have the script running once ever 6 hours to get the archives up to > date ... I just added some code so that the script wouldn't get hung up on > waiting for the search engine indexer to finish, so that mhonarc can run > several times per day properly ... > > Let me know if that helps ... > >
error in my code to regen, just fixed and forcing it to re-run right now ... hopefully that fixes it ... On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > FYI, I just looked through 1/2 dozen of the archives, and none showed > postings newer than the 11th. > > Robert Treat > > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:35, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Odd, I have the script running once ever 6 hours to get the archives up to > > date ... I just added some code so that the script wouldn't get hung up on > > waiting for the search engine indexer to finish, so that mhonarc can run > > several times per day properly ... > > > > Let me know if that helps ... > > > > > > > >
Looks good Marc, thanks for all your efforts.
Robert Treat
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, "Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
>
> error in my code to regen, just fixed and forcing it to re-run right now
> ... hopefully that fixes it ...
>
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > FYI, I just looked through 1/2 dozen of the archives, and none showed
> > postings newer than the 11th.
> >
> > Robert Treat
> >
> > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 20:35, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > >
> > > Odd, I have the script running once ever 6 hours to get the archives up to
> > > date ... I just added some code so that the script wouldn't get hung up on
> > > waiting for the search engine indexer to finish, so that mhonarc can run
> > > several times per day properly ...
> > >
> > > Let me know if that helps ...
> > >
--
LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL