Thread: PostgreSQL vs Postgres

PostgreSQL vs Postgres

From
Christopher Murtagh
Date:
 First off, Joshua, great book, it has saved me a lot of head scratching.
Thanks.

 Secondly, since the ancestor is Ingres (and not IngreSQL) and the name is
a play on *Post* Ingres... and the default user (that I've always created
anyway) is Postgres... to me Postgres is the clear winner. Besides,
whenever I mention 'Postgres' to anyone (accent in the first syllable),
they've always known what I was talking about.

 Anyway, just my $0.02.

Cheers,

Chris

--

Christopher Murtagh
Webmaster / Sysadmin
Web Communications Group
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec
Canada

Tel.: (514) 398-3122
Fax:  (514) 398-2017





Re: PostgreSQL vs Postgres

From
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
Date:
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 00:36, Christopher Murtagh wrote:

>  Secondly, since the ancestor is Ingres (and not IngreSQL) and the name is
> a play on *Post* Ingres... and the default user (that I've always created

iirc iot was more like the direct ancestor of PostgreSQL was Postgres,
which stems from Ingres.

But of course I'm also just talking of 'postgres'.

cheers
-- vbi

--
secure email with gpg                         http://fortytwo.ch/gpg

Attachment

Re: PostgreSQL vs Postgres

From
"Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Christopher Murtagh wrote:

> First off, Joshua, great book, it has saved me a lot of head scratching.
>Thanks.
>
>

Thanks :) but I am not sure what the rest of this message is in
reference to. :)

> Secondly, since the ancestor is Ingres (and not IngreSQL) and the name is
>a play on *Post* Ingres... and the default user (that I've always created
>anyway) is Postgres... to me Postgres is the clear winner. Besides,
>whenever I mention 'Postgres' to anyone (accent in the first syllable),
>they've always known what I was talking about.
>
> Anyway, just my $0.02.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Chris
>
>
>