Thread: Simple 'type' question
When creating a table with a primary key that can contain any varying sequence of alphanumeric characters, is it best to use the 'text' type or the 'varchar' type? Or will the implicit index that's created on the primary key work equally well with either type? Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Tim Barnard S.E. Mgr Hartford Communications Corporation
Thanks Tom. Tim Barnard S.E. Mgr Hartford Communications Corporation ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Tim Barnard" <tbarnard@povn.com> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Simple 'type' question > "Tim Barnard" <tbarnard@povn.com> writes: > > When creating a table with a primary key that can contain any varying > > sequence of alphanumeric characters, is it best to use the 'text' type or > > the 'varchar' type? > > If you want a specific upper limit on the string length, use varchar. > If that's not needed, use text. The only difference in performance > AFAIK is the extra function call per insert/update for the routine that > enforces the varchar limit. > > regards, tom lane >
"Tim Barnard" <tbarnard@povn.com> writes: > When creating a table with a primary key that can contain any varying > sequence of alphanumeric characters, is it best to use the 'text' type or > the 'varchar' type? If you want a specific upper limit on the string length, use varchar. If that's not needed, use text. The only difference in performance AFAIK is the extra function call per insert/update for the routine that enforces the varchar limit. regards, tom lane