Is it correct of me to assume that the concrete storage of a user
defined type, defined in C, must not contain any references to
structures allocated per-object? The documentation does not explicitly
specify this, but there is a lack of a callback in the CREATE TYPE
command to be invoked when the database type instance is no longer
referenced, so I see no way of freeing such storage if it were
allocated. Also, I can't see how the backend would know how to follow
such a reference without some indication that it was a reference, and
also the storage length of the structure. So this seems plain.
What I'd like to do is implement a structure whose concrete storage
length may change when it is operated on (a sparse matrix), but since
realloc() on most systems may change the memory location of the pointer,
I see no way of doing this given the above restriction. Perhaps it
would be possible to have a function somehow tell the back end to
associate the OID of the type instance it is operating on with a
different concrete storage block?
More generally, exactly how /does/ concrete storage allocation and
deallocation behave for user-defined types?
-David J. Trombley
<dtrom@bumba.net>
