Thread: Re: c function

> Question: Why isn't 12 printed after the second SELECT statement?

It's the well-known (?) problem that if any function parameter is NULL, they are all set to NULL.  IIRC someone is
workingon fixing this... 



Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com

On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, K Parker wrote:

> > Question: Why isn't 12 printed after the second SELECT statement?
>
> It's the well-known (?) problem that if any function parameter is
> NULL, they are all set to NULL.  IIRC someone is working on fixing
> this...

a big thanks to you and Tom for the updates.

a note though: there are no problems with the parameters that I can see.
They're passed correctly to the c function, it's just the return type
that's messed up.

I suppose we'll just have to use 'NULL'.

BTW Is it possible to use a c-function with a prototype like the following
in postgres?

int myfunc (int id, ...);


R.