Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: pgsql for win

pgsql for win

From
"Nikolay Mijaylov"
Date:
If someone have Postgres for Win 32 compiled, I want the binary...
or CygWin binary?

Merci

--------------------------------------------------------------
The reboots are for hardware upgrades!
"http://www.nmmm.nu"; < nmmm@nmmm.nu >

Re: pgsql for win

From
Thomas Good
Date:
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Nikolay Mijaylov wrote:

> If someone have Postgres for Win 32 compiled, I want the binary...
> or CygWin binary?
>
> Merci
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> The reboots are for hardware upgrades!
> "http://www.nmmm.nu"; < nmmm@nmmm.nu >

Nikolay,

My friend Ingo (cc'd here) is hard at work on this right now.
Maybe a collaboration?  I'd really like to see this happen too.

Cheers,
Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
               North Richmond Community Mental Health Center
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Good, MIS Coordinator                tomg@ { admin | q8 } .nrnet.org
                                                        Phone: 718-354-5528
                                                        Fax:   718-354-5056
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 North Richmond Systems       PostgreSQL                 s l a c k w a r e
   Are Powered By:              RDBMS                   |---------- linux
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: pgsql for win

From
Ned Lilly
Date:
Thomas Good wrote:

> On Fri, 19 May 2000, Nikolay Mijaylov wrote:
>
> > If someone have Postgres for Win 32 compiled, I want the binary...
> > or CygWin binary?
> >
> > Merci
>
> Nikolay,
>
> My friend Ingo (cc'd here) is hard at work on this right now.
> Maybe a collaboration?  I'd really like to see this happen too.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom

Tom, are you referring to a Cygwin binary, or a native NT port?

Best regards,
Ned Lilly

RE: pgsql for win

From
Horak Daniel
Date:
> If someone have Postgres for Win 32 compiled, I want the binary...
> or CygWin binary?

Joost is working on a new binary version. It will be available soon from
http://www.askesis.nl.

            Dan

Re: pgsql for win

From
Thomas Good
Date:
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Ned Lilly wrote:

> >
> > Nikolay,
> >
> > My friend Ingo (cc'd here) is hard at work on this right now.
> > Maybe a collaboration?  I'd really like to see this happen too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tom
>
> Tom, are you referring to a Cygwin binary, or a native NT port?

Ned - Ingo is trying to convince pg to run on a w98 box using cygwin.
He is talented and may convince windows to cooperate (either by surgery
or sleight of hand, dunno which.)

Cheers,
Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
               North Richmond Community Mental Health Center
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Good, MIS Coordinator                tomg@ { admin | q8 } .nrnet.org
                                                        Phone: 718-354-5528
                                                        Fax:   718-354-5056
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 North Richmond Systems       PostgreSQL                 s l a c k w a r e
   Are Powered By:              RDBMS                   |---------- linux
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RE: pgsql for win

From
Horák Daniel
Date:
> > My friend Ingo (cc'd here) is hard at work on this right now.
> > Maybe a collaboration?  I'd really like to see this happen too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tom
>
> Tom, are you referring to a Cygwin binary, or a native NT port?

I don't think it is possible to create a WinNT port without Cygwin.

Now I have 7.0beta3 compiled with Cygwin B20 - it runs on the newest Cygwin
too. The 7.0 final and the newest Cygwin compiles well (with small updates
to the sources) but I cannot get it run. It has problems with allocating
shared memory segments. It seems like "user permissions" problem.

            Dan