Thread: Non-holoalphabetic sentence in docs
Hi all, Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's still probably wrong. It appears here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#FUNCTIONS-POSIX-REGEXP "the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog" to "the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" Thanks Thom
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes: > Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example > attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended > panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's > still probably wrong. At least it would grate on somebody's nerves once they'd noticed it. Fixed in HEAD. regards, tom lane
On 16 May 2013 17:33, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes: >> Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example >> attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended >> panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's >> still probably wrong. > > At least it would grate on somebody's nerves once they'd noticed it. > Fixed in HEAD. Thanks Tom. Also, s/panagram/pangram/ in my own email. Thom