Thread: Problem building the documentation
In building the US PDF documentation I am getting this error from LaTeX: LaTeX Warning: Reference `RELEASE-8-2-7' on page xxxii undefined on input line 37586. LaTeX Warning: Reference `101577' on page xxxii undefined on input line 37612. [32.0.18 pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested. <to be read again> \endgroup l.37619 {start}} \Link% ! ==> Fatal error occurred, the output PDF file not finished! Transcript written on postgres-US.log. gmake: *** [postgres-US.pdf] Error 1 gmake: *** Deleting file `postgres-US.pdf' rm postgres-US.tex-pdf The problem is related to the release-8.2.sgml file, but if I make that file zero-length, it fails on release-8.1.sgml. I see this failure building the current PDF docs and in the 8.4 PDF docs. I did a web search for the error message and it seems to relate to links crossing page boundaries or something. I don't see any unusual constructs on the SGML files. I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what > changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds. All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fact I don't remember ever seeing a failure like the one you quote. I wonder if you are using out-of-date doc tools. regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what > > changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds. > > All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current > docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fact I don't remember > ever seeing a failure like the one you quote. I wonder if you are > using out-of-date doc tools. My version is: openjade:I: "openjade" version "1.3.2" openjade:I: "OpenSP" version "1.5" Is there some other version I should check. I used to be able to build the PDF docs, so has anything changed that would have broken my tools? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > My version is: > openjade:I: "openjade" version "1.3.2" > openjade:I: "OpenSP" version "1.5" > Is there some other version I should check. I used to be able to build > the PDF docs, so has anything changed that would have broken my tools? Dunno, here are some relevant package versions from my F11 box: texlive-2007-46.fc11.x86_64 texlive-dvips-2007-46.fc11.x86_64 texlive-latex-2007-46.fc11.x86_64 texlive-texmf-2007-34.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-34.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-2007-6.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-dvips-2007-6.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-6.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-latex-2007-6.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-34.fc11.noarch texlive-texmf-latex-2007-34.fc11.noarch texlive-utils-2007-46.fc11.x86_64 jadetex-3.13-5.fc11.noarch openjade-1.3.2-34.fc11.x86_64 opensp-1.5.2-11.fc11.x86_64 docbook-dtds-1.0-47.fc11.noarch docbook-simple-1.1-5.fc11.noarch docbook-slides-3.4.0-6.fc11.noarch docbook-style-dsssl-1.79-6.fc11.noarch docbook-style-xsl-1.75.2-1.fc11.noarch docbook-utils-0.6.14-17.fc11.noarch docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-17.fc11.noarch docbook2X-0.8.8-4.fc11.x86_64 regards, tom lane
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > [32.0.18 > pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested. A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try.
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > [32.0.18 > > pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested. > > A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try. OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a PDF build of our development docs available somewhere? That is what started all this. :-| -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a > PDF build of our development docs available somewhere? I'm building PDF docs regularly for each alpha release. http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha Hope this helps. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment
Devrim G�ND�Z wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a > > PDF build of our development docs available somewhere? > > I'm building PDF docs regularly for each alpha release. > > http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha Ah, thanks. I didn't realize we had separate links for the PDFs. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +