Thread: Re: [PATCHES] Partitioning docs

On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 22:41 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I believe this is now complete and ready for application.

The changes need a fair bit of copy editing and SGML policy work, but
that is probably easier to do once it has been applied. Barring any
objections I'll apply the patch within 24 hours.

-Neil

Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 22:41 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I believe this is now complete and ready for application.

> The changes need a fair bit of copy editing and SGML policy work, but
> that is probably easier to do once it has been applied. Barring any
> objections I'll apply the patch within 24 hours.

I'd argue for editing first and then applying.  I'll take up the job
if you don't have time for the editing part... I'm hoping to spend most
of this week on docs editing anyway, since anything else will raise
Marc's hackles about whether we need another RC ;-)

            regards, tom lane

On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 23:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd argue for editing first and then applying.  I'll take up the job
> if you don't have time for the editing part

Okay. I'll do a round of copy editing and then commit to CVS -- there
will likely be room for additional improvements, so once it's in CVS
anyone else who's interested can have at it.

-Neil

On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 23:27 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 23:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'd argue for editing first and then applying.  I'll take up the job
> > if you don't have time for the editing part
>
> Okay. I'll do a round of copy editing and then commit to CVS -- there
> will likely be room for additional improvements, so once it's in CVS
> anyone else who's interested can have at it.

Thanks guys.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs