Rich Morin writes:
> At 7:23 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise
> >you not to print it.
>
> And that reason would be??? Seriously, it seems like a useful paper;
> even if it isn't needed in the distribution, it may be worth printing.
It doesn't correspond to reality any longer.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
