Thread: pgsql: Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs

pgsql: Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs

From
Simon Riggs
Date:
Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs

Branch
------
REL8_3_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6166c7301ed9286c1e2af2f83a39e8b8225338bf

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml |   12 ++++++++++++
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)


Re: pgsql: Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs

From
Thom Brown
Date:
On 17 October 2012 08:37, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL8_3_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6166c7301ed9286c1e2af2f83a39e8b8225338bf
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml |   12 ++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

s/anwers/answers/

Also, you've said that hash indexes aren't replicated using warm
standby, which may suggest you can replicate using hot standby, which
you can't.  Shouldn't we say that they remain static on a standby
after a base backup, and that replication doesn't currently include
hash indexes?

--
Thom


Re: pgsql: Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs

From
Thom Brown
Date:
On 17 October 2012 09:02, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 08:37, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Add hash index caution to CREATE INDEX docs
>>
>> Branch
>> ------
>> REL8_3_STABLE
>>
>> Details
>> -------
>> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6166c7301ed9286c1e2af2f83a39e8b8225338bf
>>
>> Modified Files
>> --------------
>> doc/src/sgml/ref/create_index.sgml |   12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> s/anwers/answers/
>
> Also, you've said that hash indexes aren't replicated using warm
> standby, which may suggest you can replicate using hot standby, which
> you can't.  Shouldn't we say that they remain static on a standby
> after a base backup, and that replication doesn't currently include
> hash indexes?

Apologies, I see that you committed this is 2 steps, so the hot
standby remark doesn't stand for these versions.  The typo, however,
applies to both sets of commits. ;)

--
Thom