Thread: pgsql: Update struct Trigger in docs
Update struct Trigger in docs Branch ------ REL8_3_STABLE Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/11d7d11e53bfe02091cfafec5f716776acdaeeca Modified Files -------------- doc/src/sgml/trigger.sgml | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
On 20 March 2012 19:39, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > Update struct Trigger in docs > > Branch > ------ > REL8_3_STABLE > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/11d7d11e53bfe02091cfafec5f716776acdaeeca While you're at it, can you apply the following patch to reference utils/reltrigger.h instead of utils/rel.h? -- Thom
Attachment
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar mar 20 16:55:04 -0300 2012: > On 20 March 2012 19:39, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > Update struct Trigger in docs > > > > Branch > > ------ > > REL8_3_STABLE > > > > Details > > ------- > > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/11d7d11e53bfe02091cfafec5f716776acdaeeca > > While you're at it, can you apply the following patch to reference > utils/reltrigger.h instead of utils/rel.h? Yeah, thanks, I had already got that and was about to push it -- see b251cf3. One hunk in your patch is wrong though, because it's talking about RelationData struct which is still in rel.h, not reltrigger.h. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On 20 March 2012 20:13, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar mar 20 16:55:04 -0300 2012: >> On 20 March 2012 19:39, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> > Update struct Trigger in docs >> > >> > Branch >> > ------ >> > REL8_3_STABLE >> > >> > Details >> > ------- >> > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/11d7d11e53bfe02091cfafec5f716776acdaeeca >> >> While you're at it, can you apply the following patch to reference >> utils/reltrigger.h instead of utils/rel.h? > > Yeah, thanks, I had already got that and was about to push it -- see > b251cf3. One hunk in your patch is wrong though, because it's talking > about RelationData struct which is still in rel.h, not reltrigger.h. Yes, you're right. I should have read it more carefully. Thanks. -- Thom