Thread: pgsql: On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.

pgsql: On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.

From

Tom Lane

Date:

11 March 2011, 23:04:44

On further reflection, we'd better do the same in int.c.

We previously heard of the same problem in int24div(), so there's not a
good reason to suppose the problem is confined to cases involving int8.

Branch
------
REL9_0_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f6b2ab7d95d718f67c0cde8e7638053d40c221e6

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/utils/adt/int.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)