Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: pgsql: Actually, instead of whining about how type internal might not

pgsql: Actually, instead of whining about how type internal might not

From
tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Date:
Log Message:
-----------
Actually, instead of whining about how type internal might not safely store
a pointer, why don't we just fix that.  Every known use of "internal" really
means a pointer anyway.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt:
        array_userfuncs.c (r1.25 -> r1.26)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/array_userfuncs.c?r1=1.25&r2=1.26)
    pgsql/src/bin/initdb:
        initdb.c (r1.163 -> r1.164)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/bin/initdb/initdb.c?r1=1.163&r2=1.164)
    pgsql/src/include/catalog:
        catversion.h (r1.506 -> r1.507)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/catalog/catversion.h?r1=1.506&r2=1.507)
        pg_type.h (r1.201 -> r1.202)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/catalog/pg_type.h?r1=1.201&r2=1.202)