Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: pgsql: Additional test coverage for int8 type (int8.c)

pgsql: Additional test coverage for int8 type (int8.c)

From
petere@postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut)
Date:
Log Message:
-----------
Additional test coverage for int8 type (int8.c)
int8-exp-three-digits.out update untested, might need refinement.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/test/regress/expected:
        int8-exp-three-digits.out (r1.9 -> r1.10)

(http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/int8-exp-three-digits.out?r1=1.9&r2=1.10)
        int8.out (r1.12 -> r1.13)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/int8.out?r1=1.12&r2=1.13)
    pgsql/src/test/regress/sql:
        int8.sql (r1.9 -> r1.10)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/sql/int8.sql?r1=1.9&r2=1.10)

Re: pgsql: Additional test coverage for int8 type (int8.c)

From
Tom Lane
Date:
petere@postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> Additional test coverage for int8 type (int8.c)
> int8-exp-three-digits.out update untested, might need refinement.

Either this patch or the bool one broke the buildfarm.

            regards, tom lane