Thread: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >

Log Message:
-----------
TODO item not wanted:

>
> * Embedded server (not wanted)
>
>   While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
>   server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
>   run reliabily and efficiently.  Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
>   to run in the same process address space as the client application
>   would add too much complexity and failure cases.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/doc:
        TODO (r1.2016 -> r1.2017)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.2016&r2=1.2017)
    pgsql/doc/src/FAQ:
        TODO.html (r1.518 -> r1.519)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html.diff?r1=1.518&r2=1.519)

Thanks, fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian@postgresql.org> wrote:
> >
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > TODO item not wanted:
> >
> > >
> > > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> > >
> > >   While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the
>
>
> I think its a typo. Should it have been:
>
> > While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the
>
> Or 'under' !
>
> >   server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> > >   run reliabily and efficiently.  Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> > >   to run in the same process address space as the client application
> > >   would add too much complexity and failure cases.
> >
> >
>
> --
> gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
> singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +