Thread: pginstaller - CVSROOT: Update address for CVS messages to be
pginstaller - CVSROOT: Update address for CVS messages to be
From
mha@pgfoundry.org (User Mha)
Date:
Log Message:
-----------
Update address for CVS messages to be pginstaller-commit@pgfoundry.org to avoid slow mail forwarding on
pgsql-committers
Modified Files:
--------------
CVSROOT:
loginfo (r1.2 -> r1.3)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pginstaller/CVSROOT/loginfo.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
Please change it back ... I just added: post allow $host =~ /pgfoundry\.org/ to the committers list that should have commits pass through directly now ... On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, User Mha wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Update address for CVS messages to be pginstaller-commit@pgfoundry.org to avoid slow mail forwarding on pgsql-committers > > Modified Files: > -------------- > CVSROOT: > loginfo (r1.2 -> r1.3) > (http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pginstaller/CVSROOT/loginfo.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 14:38, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Please change it back Why does pgfoundry commit mail go to pgsql-committers in the first place? -Neil
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Neil Conway wrote: > Why does pgfoundry commit mail go to pgsql-committers in the first > place? > Supposedly so we can monitor the activity of all of the projects hosted on pgfoundry. You missed the discussion this summer, but Peter E. and myself think it's a bad idea, Marc likes it and everyone else doesn't seem to care. Kris Jurka
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 19:10, Kris Jurka wrote: > Supposedly so we can monitor the activity of all of the projects hosted on > pgfoundry. You missed the discussion this summer, but Peter E. and myself > think it's a bad idea, Marc likes it and everyone else doesn't seem to > care. Well, let me side with those who think this is a bad idea. But since this has apparently been decided, I'll desist. -Neil
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Neil Conway wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 19:10, Kris Jurka wrote: >> Supposedly so we can monitor the activity of all of the projects hosted on >> pgfoundry. You missed the discussion this summer, but Peter E. and myself >> think it's a bad idea, Marc likes it and everyone else doesn't seem to >> care. > > Well, let me side with those who think this is a bad idea. But since > this has apparently been decided, I'll desist. For the time being, "its been decided" ... there isn't *alot* of traffic arising from it ... if/when there is, we can easily create a side committers list for projects vs core that ppl can opt into ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664