Thread: BUG #5696: cannot upgrade to 9.0.1
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5696 Logged by: Tony Marston Email address: tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk PostgreSQL version: 9.0 Operating system: Widows XP Description: cannot upgrade to 9.0.1 Details: I have just installed version 9.0, and I tried to follow it immediately with an upgrade to 9.0.1, but it failed with the following message: The existing data directory (catalog version: ) is not compatible with this server (catalog version: 201008051)
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Tony Marston <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: =A0 =A0 =A05696 > Logged by: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Tony Marston > Email address: =A0 =A0 =A0tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk > PostgreSQL version: 9.0 > Operating system: =A0 Widows XP > Description: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cannot upgrade to 9.0.1 > Details: > > I have just installed version 9.0, and I tried to follow it immediately w= ith > an upgrade to 9.0.1, but it failed with the following message: > > The existing data directory (catalog version: ) is not compatible with th= is > server (catalog version: 201008051) That implies that the installer was unable to extract the catalog version from your existing data directory. Can you please post the logfile form %TEMP%? It should include the pg_controldata output. --=20 Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Tony Marston <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk> wrote: > I found the log file, and when it looked at it there was a reference to the > 64 bit version of Windows, which I don't have. I downloaded the 32 bit > version (which I'm sure I did the first time, but I must have been wrong), > ran it, and it worked OK. Sorry for the confusion. OK, thanks for letting us know. Dharmendra - can you see if there's an easy way to prevent the 64bit installer running on 32bit Windows please? -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
Hi Dave, We do not allow 64 bit installer to run on 32 bit windows and this check is already there. Regards, Dharmendra On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Tony Marston > <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk> wrote: > > I found the log file, and when it looked at it there was a reference to > the > > 64 bit version of Windows, which I don't have. I downloaded the 32 bit > > version (which I'm sure I did the first time, but I must have been > wrong), > > ran it, and it worked OK. Sorry for the confusion. > > OK, thanks for letting us know. > > Dharmendra - can you see if there's an easy way to prevent the 64bit > installer running on 32bit Windows please? > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company > -- Dharmendra Goyal Senior Software Engineer EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise Postgres Company Phone: +91-20-30589493 Mobile: +91-9552103323 Website: http://www.enterprisedb.com EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/ Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Dharmendra Goyal <dharmendra.goyal@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > We do not allow 64 bit installer to run on 32 bit windows and this check is > already there. Oh, hmm. Tony, are you running the 64bit version of XP? I assumed not, as it's pretty rare, but.... -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tony Marston <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk> wrote: > My processor is 32 bit and my OS is 32 bit. Sounds like the existing check is broken then Dharmendra. Please take a look when you get a moment. Thanks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company