Thread: Status of submitted bugs
Hi, months ago I=92ve submitted a bug (#4953). Is there a way to know its=20=20 status and if it will be fixed? Thank you in advance -- Giorgio Valoti
Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@me.com> writes:
> months ago Ive submitted a bug (#4953). Is there a way to know its
> status and if it will be fixed?
[ looks up 4953... ] Oh, the contrib/xml2 memory management mess :-(.
Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix for that. That code is on its
way out anyway, and so nobody seems to be willing to put in the amount
of effort that would be needed to fix it. I'd recommend migrating to
the core XML support instead.
regards, tom lane
Il giorno 28/gen/10, alle ore 17:28, Tom Lane ha scritto: > Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@me.com> writes: >> months ago I=92ve submitted a bug (#4953). Is there a way to know its >> status and if it will be fixed? > > [ looks up 4953... ] Oh, the contrib/xml2 memory management mess :-(. > Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix for that. That code is on=20=20 > its > way out anyway, and so nobody seems to be willing to put in the amount > of effort that would be needed to fix it. I'd recommend migrating to > the core XML support instead. Ok, sorry for the silly question but is the xml core support=20=20 comparable to contrib/xml2? Is it already there in 8.4 or is scheduled=20= =20 for 8.5? Thank you in advance! Ciao -- Giorgio Valoti
Giorgio Valoti wrote: > > Il giorno 28/gen/10, alle ore 17:28, Tom Lane ha scritto: > > > Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@me.com> writes: > >> months ago I?ve submitted a bug (#4953). Is there a way to know its > >> status and if it will be fixed? > > > > [ looks up 4953... ] Oh, the contrib/xml2 memory management mess :-(. > > Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix for that. That code is on > > its > > way out anyway, and so nobody seems to be willing to put in the amount > > of effort that would be needed to fix it. I'd recommend migrating to > > the core XML support instead. > > Ok, sorry for the silly question but is the xml core support > comparable to contrib/xml2? Is it already there in 8.4 or is scheduled > for 8.5? It is in 8.4 and is superior to what was supported in contrib/xml2. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 18:15 +0100, Giorgio Valoti wrote: > Ok, sorry for the silly question but is the xml core support > comparable to contrib/xml2? Is it already there in 8.4 or is scheduled > for 8.5? It's available in 8.3 and later. The documentation can be found here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/datatype-xml.html http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/functions-xml.html Regards, Jeff Davis
Il giorno 28/gen/10, alle ore 18:32, Bruce Momjian ha scritto: > Giorgio Valoti wrote: >> >> Il giorno 28/gen/10, alle ore 17:28, Tom Lane ha scritto: >> >>> Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@me.com> writes: >>>> months ago I?ve submitted a bug (#4953). Is there a way to know its >>>> status and if it will be fixed? >>> >>> [ looks up 4953... ] Oh, the contrib/xml2 memory management=20=20 >>> mess :-(. >>> Don't hold your breath waiting for a fix for that. That code is on >>> its >>> way out anyway, and so nobody seems to be willing to put in the=20=20 >>> amount >>> of effort that would be needed to fix it. I'd recommend migrating=20= =20 >>> to >>> the core XML support instead. >> >> Ok, sorry for the silly question but is the xml core support >> comparable to contrib/xml2? Is it already there in 8.4 or is=20=20 >> scheduled >> for 8.5? > > It is in 8.4 and is superior to what was supported in contrib/xml2. I don=92t see the xslt_process function. Should I process xml outside=20=20 PostgreSQL? Not a big problem but I chose contrib/xml2 for xslt=20=20 processing, too. Thank you -- Giorgio Valoti