Thread: BUG #2773: Problem pg_get_serial_sequence
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2773 Logged by: Amelio Email address: ameliocf@yahoo.com.br PostgreSQL version: 8.2 beta 2 Operating system: Windows XP Description: Problem pg_get_serial_sequence Details: The pg_get_serial_sequence function is returning the name of the index on the referenced column.
Amelio wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 2773 > Logged by: Amelio > Email address: ameliocf@yahoo.com.br > PostgreSQL version: 8.2 beta 2 > Operating system: Windows XP > Description: Problem pg_get_serial_sequence > Details: > > The pg_get_serial_sequence function is returning the name of the index on > the referenced column. Can you provide a reproducible test case? It looks OK to me: test=> CREATE TABLE test (x SERIAL); NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "test_x_seq" for serial column "test.x" CREATE TABLE test=> SELECT pg_get_serial_sequence('test', 'x'); pg_get_serial_sequence ------------------------ public.test_x_seq (1 row) test=> CREATE INDEX i_test ON test(x); CREATE INDEX test=> SELECT pg_get_serial_sequence('test', 'x'); pg_get_serial_sequence ------------------------ public.test_x_seq (1 row) -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Amelio wrote: > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference: 2773 > Logged by: Amelio > Email address: ameliocf@yahoo.com.br > PostgreSQL version: 8.2 beta 2 > Operating system: Windows XP > Description: Problem pg_get_serial_sequence > Details: > > The pg_get_serial_sequence function is returning the name of the index on > the referenced column. Thanks for the report but this is is already fixed in the current codebase: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00074.php Stefan
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Amelio wrote: >> The pg_get_serial_sequence function is returning the name of the index on >> the referenced column. > Can you provide a reproducible test case? It looks OK to me: That's because it's been fixed... http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00074.php regards, tom lane