Thread: Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

From
"Magnus Hagander"
Date:
> With the patch applied, I let an inhouse stress test run for=20
> several hours and it completed without incident.  I also ran=20
> two runs of pgbench with 50 connections x 1000 transactions=20
> and one run of 50 connections x 5000 transactions.  All=20
> completed successfully.  (Test server is a dual Xeon with=20
> HyperThreading enabled, Windows Server 2003, PG 8.1.3).

Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?

//Magnus

Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

From
"Peter Brant"
Date:
Test server has SP1.  This bug has only bit us twice (and never in a
testing environment) so it's hard to say (from our experience).

The successful pgbench runs are definitely good to see though.

Pete

>>> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> 05/02/06 10:14 am >>>
Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?