In the current sources, I see:
for (lineoff = FirstOffsetNumber; lineoff <= max; lineoff++)
so it looks like we have this fixed. You can check the 7.1RC1.
>
> If PostgreSQL failed to compile on your computer or you found a bug that
> is likely to be specific to one platform then please fill out this form
> and e-mail it to pgsql-ports@postgresql.org.
>
> To report any other bug, fill out the form below and e-mail it to
> pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org.
>
> If you not only found the problem but solved it and generated a patch
> then e-mail it to pgsql-patches@postgresql.org instead. Please use the
> command "diff -c" to generate the patch.
>
> You may also enter a bug report at http://www.postgresql.org/ instead of
> e-mail-ing this form.
>
> ============================================================================
> POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
> ============================================================================
>
>
> Your name : Alexis Wilke
> Your email address : alexis@m2osw.com
>
>
> System Configuration
> ---------------------
> Architecture (example: Intel Pentium) : trust me, doesn't matter
>
> Operating System (example: Linux 2.0.26 ELF) : trust me, doesn't matter
>
> PostgreSQL version (example: PostgreSQL-7.0): since PostgreSQL-6.5.x
> and still in the code
>
> Compiler used (example: gcc 2.8.0) : trust me, doesn't matter
>
>
> Please enter a FULL description of your problem:
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> It crashes when pg_database is too large. This is because
> the index is compare to max with <= instead of <. I already
> fixed the bug on my system. That's at line
>
>
>
> Please describe a way to repeat the problem. Please try to provide a
> concise reproducible example, if at all possible:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Create many database (or create/destroy the same many times).
>
> Once the pg_database is more than one page (is 16Kb or more) then it
> starts
> crashing. (may not crash on all systems, but trust me, my fix
> will work GREAT).
>
>
>
> If you know how this problem might be fixed, list the solution below:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Okay, so go in the following file:
>
> ./src/backend/utils/misc/database.c
>
> and move to the line #183 (V7.0.1)
>
> There, fix the for() as is:
>
> for(i = 0; i < max; i++)
>
> Why? Well, because 'i' starts at 0, therefore, you
> can't access the tuple number 'max'. If you look in
> other source files, you will quickly see that all
> these for() loops are starting with an index of
> 1 and use some special functions/macros to access
> the tuple data.
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
