Thread: Datatype SERIAL incorrectly interpreted

Datatype SERIAL incorrectly interpreted

From
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Date:
Hubert Hafner (dogart@iname.com) reports a bug with a severity of 3
The lower the number the more severe it is.

Short Description
Datatype SERIAL incorrectly interpreted

Long Description
If you create a table with more than 1 SERIAL, only for the last a sequence is created by PostgreSQL. The other fields
onlyset to INTEGER, but there is no sequence for. 

Sample Code
CREATE TABLE Example (Field1 SERIAL, Field2 SERIAL);

PostgreSQL would generate:
Table Example:
Field1 as INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval(Field1_Example_seq)
Field2 as INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval(Field2_Example_seq)

But only Field2_Example_seq really exits!




No file was uploaded with this report

Re: Datatype SERIAL incorrectly interpreted

From
Tom Lane
Date:
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org writes:
> If you create a table with more than 1 SERIAL, only for the last a
> sequence is created by PostgreSQL. The other fields only set to
> INTEGER, but there is no sequence for.

This is fixed in 7.1.

            regards, tom lane