Thread: 9.6Beta1 Released (Where advocated)
Hello, Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has been mentioned. I have posted to: Twitter (@postgresql) r/postgresql r/opensource r/databases Hackernews Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. What has everyone else got? Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has > been mentioned. I have posted to: > > Twitter (@postgresql) > r/postgresql > r/opensource > r/databases > Hackernews > Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) > > I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. > > What has everyone else got? Might go better if this is fixed: Release Notes Link is broken on the website http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1641551954.4473261.1463060934901.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com > > Sincerely, > > JD > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On 05/12/2016 07:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >> been mentioned. I have posted to: >> >> Twitter (@postgresql) >> r/postgresql >> r/opensource >> r/databases >> Hackernews >> Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) >> >> I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. >> >> What has everyone else got? > > Might go better if this is fixed: > > Release Notes Link is broken on the website > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1641551954.4473261.1463060934901.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com Seems like it works fine to me? JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 05/12/2016 07:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >> been mentioned. I have posted to: >> >> Twitter (@postgresql) >> r/postgresql >> r/opensource >> r/databases >> Hackernews >> Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) >> >> I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. Other mentions: Not relevant to 9.6 but great timing: http://fortune.com/2016/05/11/salesforce-two-software-worlds/ Non-English: http://www.linuxexpres.cz/novinky/postgresql-9-6-ziska-podporu-paralelnich-dotazu http://www.programmez.com/actualites/postgresql-96-beta-24343 And Phoronix: http://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=PostgreSQL-9.6-Early-Look Sincerely, JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 05/12/2016 07:01 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/12/2016 07:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >>> been mentioned. I have posted to: >>> >>> Twitter (@postgresql) >>> r/postgresql >>> r/opensource >>> r/databases >>> Hackernews >>> Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) >>> >>> I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. >>> >>> What has everyone else got? >> >> Might go better if this is fixed: >> >> Release Notes Link is broken on the website >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1641551954.4473261.1463060934901.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com >> > > Seems like it works fine to me? Click on the: 9.6 Beta 1 Release Notes Also look at the versions in the title versus the versions actually being released. > > JD > > > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On 05/12/2016 07:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >> been mentioned. I have posted to: >> >> Twitter (@postgresql) >> r/postgresql >> r/opensource >> r/databases >> Hackernews >> Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) >> >> I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. >> >> What has everyone else got? > > Might go better if this is fixed: > > Release Notes Link is broken on the website > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1641551954.4473261.1463060934901.JavaMail.zimbra@dbi-services.com Yep, confirmed. I sent it to -www and pinged magnus. > > >> >> Sincerely, >> >> JD >> >> > > -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 05/12/2016 07:05 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 05/12/2016 07:01 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 07:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >>> On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Seems like it works fine to me? > > Click on the: > > 9.6 Beta 1 Release Notes > > Also look at the versions in the title versus the versions actually > being released. Yep, confirmed, Magnus and Dave (as well as operations team for www) have been notified. JD > >> >> JD >> >> >> >> > > -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Yep, confirmed, Magnus and Dave (as well as operations team for www) have > been notified. Also, it looks like headline on the homepage shows older numbers for back-branch releases: PostgreSQL 9.6 Beta 1, 9.5.2, 9.4.7, 9.3.12, 9.2.16 and 9.1.21 Released! That needs to be fixed. Thanks, Amit
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, it looks like headline on the homepage shows older numbers for > back-branch releases: Oops, didn't see that Adrian already mentioned that. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, Amit
On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has > been mentioned. I have posted to: > > Twitter (@postgresql) Retweeted well. > r/postgresql This resulted in some great discussion > r/opensource This was upvoted well. > r/databases They did not like the post. > Hackernews I wish we has some metrics for this one. > Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) Obviously well received. I also did the G+ PostgreSQL group. > > I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. This is next week. > > What has everyone else got? > http://sdtimes.com/postgresql-9-6-beta-syntaxnet-goes-open-source-mozilla-files-motion-u-s-district-court-sd-times-news-digest-may-13-2016/ http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/23555/postgresql-96-beta-1-freigegeben.html > Sincerely, > > JD > > -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 13/05/16 19:06, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >> been mentioned. I have posted to: >> > >> r/databases > > They did not like the post. > What do you mean did not like? It's top post there currently. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On 05/13/2016 10:22 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > On 13/05/16 19:06, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >>> been mentioned. I have posted to: >>> >> >>> r/databases >> >> They did not like the post. >> > > What do you mean did not like? It's top post there currently. Not top post, last post or more accurately most current post. That said, when I checked it for this email it had zero upvotes and I am also not worried about it, there are only 254 subscribers. JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
On 13/05/16 19:28, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/13/2016 10:22 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> On 13/05/16 19:06, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has >>>> been mentioned. I have posted to: >>>> >>> >>>> r/databases >>> >>> They did not like the post. >>> >> >> What do you mean did not like? It's top post there currently. > > Not top post, last post or more accurately most current post. > Well it's top in the "hot" listing which is the important one (whatever you want to call it). > That said, when I checked it for this email it had zero upvotes and I am > also not worried about it, there are only 254 subscribers. > That's because the main db community is in r/database (singular), probably something to keep in mind for beta2. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On 05/12/2016 06:53 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > Now that 9.6Beta1 is out, I wanted to compile a list of where it has > been mentioned. I have posted to: > > Twitter (@postgresql) > r/postgresql > r/opensource > r/databases > Hackernews > Facebook (PostgreSQL Server group) Cool, thanks for doing all the redditing. > > I will also be blogging on PostgreSQL.US about the release. > > What has everyone else got? Expect LWN after pgCon. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)